<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why FOX NEWS, Isn&#8217;t actually NEWS at all</title>
	<atom:link href="http://orangejuiceblog.com/2009/10/why-fox-news-isnt-actually-news-at-all/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://orangejuiceblog.com/2009/10/why-fox-news-isnt-actually-news-at-all/</link>
	<description>Orange County&#039;s top political blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:08:43 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Terry Crowley</title>
		<link>http://orangejuiceblog.com/2009/10/why-fox-news-isnt-actually-news-at-all/comment-page-1/#comment-109435</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Crowley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=30667#comment-109435</guid>
		<description>Hoots from who? A bunch of brain farts for whom the world hasn&#039;t changed since they were 18? Means I&#039;m doing something right then...

Have a nice day!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hoots from who? A bunch of brain farts for whom the world hasn&#8217;t changed since they were 18? Means I&#8217;m doing something right then&#8230;</p>
<p>Have a nice day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vern Nelson</title>
		<link>http://orangejuiceblog.com/2009/10/why-fox-news-isnt-actually-news-at-all/comment-page-1/#comment-109432</link>
		<dc:creator>Vern Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=30667#comment-109432</guid>
		<description>Okay then, cook up your Obama on the Golf Course post, but be prepared for hoots of derision!  I think I may sit that one out.  Good day, sir.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay then, cook up your Obama on the Golf Course post, but be prepared for hoots of derision!  I think I may sit that one out.  Good day, sir.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michelle Quinn</title>
		<link>http://orangejuiceblog.com/2009/10/why-fox-news-isnt-actually-news-at-all/comment-page-1/#comment-109431</link>
		<dc:creator>michelle Quinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=30667#comment-109431</guid>
		<description>Hi Red:)

Yes they do watch it to catch up on American news and politics. 

The Acorn mess, was a big shocker in Ireland. My sister could not believe that an organization even existed like Acorn. She could not believe they were getting so much in tax funds. Like I have always said, the term Social Justice, really means, &quot;to create the poor, and profit from it&quot;. 


Fox news, breaks the news that we have been expecting to hear. That is why Fox News, is #1.

Red Vixen was exactly right the other day when she said 76% of Americans want a strong public option for health care. That was a Washington Post poll last week. And to you I know that’s “left.”

Sorry Red, did you mean 76% of slackers. Because they are the only people who would want anything public!. 

You my friend, are having a wee brain fart:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Red:)</p>
<p>Yes they do watch it to catch up on American news and politics. </p>
<p>The Acorn mess, was a big shocker in Ireland. My sister could not believe that an organization even existed like Acorn. She could not believe they were getting so much in tax funds. Like I have always said, the term Social Justice, really means, &#8220;to create the poor, and profit from it&#8221;. </p>
<p>Fox news, breaks the news that we have been expecting to hear. That is why Fox News, is #1.</p>
<p>Red Vixen was exactly right the other day when she said 76% of Americans want a strong public option for health care. That was a Washington Post poll last week. And to you I know that’s “left.”</p>
<p>Sorry Red, did you mean 76% of slackers. Because they are the only people who would want anything public!. </p>
<p>You my friend, are having a wee brain fart:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://orangejuiceblog.com/2009/10/why-fox-news-isnt-actually-news-at-all/comment-page-1/#comment-109429</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=30667#comment-109429</guid>
		<description>&quot;Stop calling the public option something other than what it is...&quot;

You mean like when you engage in nothing more than speculation and proclaim that it is nothing more than a socialist takeover of the healthcare system? LOL.

I call it exactly what it is...a public option to the private healthcare market. Option. Option. Option. See that word? Option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Stop calling the public option something other than what it is&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>You mean like when you engage in nothing more than speculation and proclaim that it is nothing more than a socialist takeover of the healthcare system? LOL.</p>
<p>I call it exactly what it is&#8230;a public option to the private healthcare market. Option. Option. Option. See that word? Option.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Crowley</title>
		<link>http://orangejuiceblog.com/2009/10/why-fox-news-isnt-actually-news-at-all/comment-page-1/#comment-109425</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Crowley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=30667#comment-109425</guid>
		<description>Vern,

One wishes the veracity of your claims could be upheld. Alas, not much from your blowhole proves anything at all.

I think how much our teleprompter in chief actually spends on the job, like the rest of Congress, is a story. Again, THAT is news. Not the latest &quot;People love Public Option&quot; propaganda.

The REAL truth is that a majority don&#039;t want Obamacare, and dont want a plan only Demoncrats support. 

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1295.xml?ReleaseID=1382

You can CLAIM that people want a &quot;Public Option&quot; but Demoncrats can&#039;t keep their sticky little socialist fingers off of it. Just pass the reform and leave the dogma at home.

I&#039;ve written before, mandate coverage, use the funds to help everyone else get there, and the democrats can worry about the cost later. stop saying it will be &quot;deficit neutral&quot; or cost saving. Those aren&#039;t in your repertoire of concerns, as spending other peoples money is of no concern to leftists. Stop calling the public option something other than what it is, and join reality, loser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vern,</p>
<p>One wishes the veracity of your claims could be upheld. Alas, not much from your blowhole proves anything at all.</p>
<p>I think how much our teleprompter in chief actually spends on the job, like the rest of Congress, is a story. Again, THAT is news. Not the latest &#8220;People love Public Option&#8221; propaganda.</p>
<p>The REAL truth is that a majority don&#8217;t want Obamacare, and dont want a plan only Demoncrats support. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1295.xml?ReleaseID=1382" rel="nofollow">http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1295.xml?ReleaseID=1382</a></p>
<p>You can CLAIM that people want a &#8220;Public Option&#8221; but Demoncrats can&#8217;t keep their sticky little socialist fingers off of it. Just pass the reform and leave the dogma at home.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve written before, mandate coverage, use the funds to help everyone else get there, and the democrats can worry about the cost later. stop saying it will be &#8220;deficit neutral&#8221; or cost saving. Those aren&#8217;t in your repertoire of concerns, as spending other peoples money is of no concern to leftists. Stop calling the public option something other than what it is, and join reality, loser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vern Nelson</title>
		<link>http://orangejuiceblog.com/2009/10/why-fox-news-isnt-actually-news-at-all/comment-page-1/#comment-109424</link>
		<dc:creator>Vern Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=30667#comment-109424</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;This is hilarious! A bunch of Democrat apologists first denying that MSNBC is a liberal bullhorn, then saying “hey, lets look forward, not back!”&lt;/i&gt;

I&#039;m sorry, I really don&#039;t understand what you&#039;re saying here.  Do you need a cup of coffee?  Get those neurons firing better?

&lt;i&gt;Bet if I wrote a piece about all the time Obama has spent on the green hitting around a little ball in his nine months, we’d talk about all the time Bush spent on vacation instead.&lt;/i&gt;

That would be a pretty lame piece, I hope you don&#039;t waste your time writing it.  And that would be a pretty difficult comeback to resist.  But like I said, I personally am going to save the &quot;Bush was worse and you guys have such double standards&quot; component as &quot;Frosting&quot; - frosting on the cake of either defending or criticising Obama&#039;s actions on their own merit.  I will never leave out the cake.  Can&#039;t speak for my comrades. 

&lt;i&gt;Start admitting that when some news sources start putting out information you don’t like, leftists attack it.&lt;/i&gt;

&quot;Don&#039;t like?&quot;  You mean, disagree with, or consider inaccurate?  Well of course we would &quot;attack it&quot; by which I assume you mean, argue.  Shouldn&#039;t we?  Or do you mean, valid information that makes us uncomfortable.  Well, an example of that latter would be the video you put up of some Obama underling quoting Mao as a favorite philosopher with no obvious irony or caveats.  I don&#039;t know if anything was cut out of that video by the Fox people, but as it stands, I couldn&#039;t defend her and said so.

&lt;i&gt;Jake Tapper is probably not long for his job the way he asks real questions. &lt;/i&gt;

Jake is a very good journalist.  I assume he asked some questions recently that made you happy.  Want to share?  I hope he doesn&#039;t go the way of the Washington Post&#039;s great Froomkin.

&lt;i&gt;Hint: he’s not on Fox. &lt;/i&gt;

I know who Jake Tapper is, dork.

&lt;i&gt;Admit its intellectual laziness on the part of leftists that 1. they don’t want to admit there is nothing to their left they wouldnt disagree with &lt;/i&gt;

Not true.  There are things to my left that even I, FAR LEFT VERN, disagree with, but why get into that when to YOU, Barack Obama is a leftist.  There are plenty of us over here saying, Hey Mr President, what about single-payer healthcare, what&#039;s taking so long on Guantanamo and giving trials to our prisoners, let&#039;s get out of this quagmire in Afghanistan, will you finally take some control of these Wall Street monstrosities instead of dancing to their tune, and much more.

&lt;i&gt;2. most Americans don’t buy it &lt;/i&gt;

Red Vixen was exactly right the other day when she said 76% of Americans want a strong public option for health care.  That was a Washington Post poll last week.  And to you I know that&#039;s &quot;left.&quot;

&lt;i&gt;3. very few people are actually watching left wing point of view news.&lt;/i&gt;

Well, then our stations and channels should go out of business very soon and you won&#039;t have to worry about us any more!

This could get tiresome if I respond to everything you write, but on principle I sometimes will.  I&#039;ll watch your silly 9-minute Pajamas Media video if I get the slightest evidence you watched Red Vixen&#039;s 7-minute Maddow video.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>This is hilarious! A bunch of Democrat apologists first denying that MSNBC is a liberal bullhorn, then saying “hey, lets look forward, not back!”</i></p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry, I really don&#8217;t understand what you&#8217;re saying here.  Do you need a cup of coffee?  Get those neurons firing better?</p>
<p><i>Bet if I wrote a piece about all the time Obama has spent on the green hitting around a little ball in his nine months, we’d talk about all the time Bush spent on vacation instead.</i></p>
<p>That would be a pretty lame piece, I hope you don&#8217;t waste your time writing it.  And that would be a pretty difficult comeback to resist.  But like I said, I personally am going to save the &#8220;Bush was worse and you guys have such double standards&#8221; component as &#8220;Frosting&#8221; &#8211; frosting on the cake of either defending or criticising Obama&#8217;s actions on their own merit.  I will never leave out the cake.  Can&#8217;t speak for my comrades. </p>
<p><i>Start admitting that when some news sources start putting out information you don’t like, leftists attack it.</i></p>
<p>&#8220;Don&#8217;t like?&#8221;  You mean, disagree with, or consider inaccurate?  Well of course we would &#8220;attack it&#8221; by which I assume you mean, argue.  Shouldn&#8217;t we?  Or do you mean, valid information that makes us uncomfortable.  Well, an example of that latter would be the video you put up of some Obama underling quoting Mao as a favorite philosopher with no obvious irony or caveats.  I don&#8217;t know if anything was cut out of that video by the Fox people, but as it stands, I couldn&#8217;t defend her and said so.</p>
<p><i>Jake Tapper is probably not long for his job the way he asks real questions. </i></p>
<p>Jake is a very good journalist.  I assume he asked some questions recently that made you happy.  Want to share?  I hope he doesn&#8217;t go the way of the Washington Post&#8217;s great Froomkin.</p>
<p><i>Hint: he’s not on Fox. </i></p>
<p>I know who Jake Tapper is, dork.</p>
<p><i>Admit its intellectual laziness on the part of leftists that 1. they don’t want to admit there is nothing to their left they wouldnt disagree with </i></p>
<p>Not true.  There are things to my left that even I, FAR LEFT VERN, disagree with, but why get into that when to YOU, Barack Obama is a leftist.  There are plenty of us over here saying, Hey Mr President, what about single-payer healthcare, what&#8217;s taking so long on Guantanamo and giving trials to our prisoners, let&#8217;s get out of this quagmire in Afghanistan, will you finally take some control of these Wall Street monstrosities instead of dancing to their tune, and much more.</p>
<p><i>2. most Americans don’t buy it </i></p>
<p>Red Vixen was exactly right the other day when she said 76% of Americans want a strong public option for health care.  That was a Washington Post poll last week.  And to you I know that&#8217;s &#8220;left.&#8221;</p>
<p><i>3. very few people are actually watching left wing point of view news.</i></p>
<p>Well, then our stations and channels should go out of business very soon and you won&#8217;t have to worry about us any more!</p>
<p>This could get tiresome if I respond to everything you write, but on principle I sometimes will.  I&#8217;ll watch your silly 9-minute Pajamas Media video if I get the slightest evidence you watched Red Vixen&#8217;s 7-minute Maddow video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://orangejuiceblog.com/2009/10/why-fox-news-isnt-actually-news-at-all/comment-page-1/#comment-109422</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=30667#comment-109422</guid>
		<description>Mr. Crowley,

When you acknowledge that Maddow has taken on the President (and you know she has), then, and only then, will you even BEGIN to have the credibility to lecture us on intellectual laziness. Take a look in the mirror buddy.

Did anyone here say that MSNBC does not have liberal observers? No. Does Fox have partisan conservative observers? Yes. So what have we established? Nothing. Absolutely nothing. We have noticed that you have utterly failed to address the SUBSTANCE of Maddow&#039;s story. Perhaps you could muster up the courage to make an argument on THAT, instead of simply bringing the rank, dismissive, partisan nothingness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Crowley,</p>
<p>When you acknowledge that Maddow has taken on the President (and you know she has), then, and only then, will you even BEGIN to have the credibility to lecture us on intellectual laziness. Take a look in the mirror buddy.</p>
<p>Did anyone here say that MSNBC does not have liberal observers? No. Does Fox have partisan conservative observers? Yes. So what have we established? Nothing. Absolutely nothing. We have noticed that you have utterly failed to address the SUBSTANCE of Maddow&#8217;s story. Perhaps you could muster up the courage to make an argument on THAT, instead of simply bringing the rank, dismissive, partisan nothingness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Crowley</title>
		<link>http://orangejuiceblog.com/2009/10/why-fox-news-isnt-actually-news-at-all/comment-page-1/#comment-109418</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Crowley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=30667#comment-109418</guid>
		<description>This is hilarious! A bunch of Democrat apologists first denying that MSNBC is a liberal bullhorn, then saying &quot;hey, lets look forward, not back!&quot;

Bet if I wrote a piece about all the time Obama has spent on the green hitting around a little ball in his nine months, we&#039;d talk about all the time Bush spent on vacation instead. You people take NO time examining the veracity of your comments or opinions. You just feel them. 

Vern, I would give you some advice in return. Start admitting that when some news sources start putting out information you don&#039;t like, leftists attack it. Jake Tapper is probably not long for his job the way he asks real questions. 

Hint: he&#039;s not on Fox. 

Admit its intellectual laziness on the part of leftists that 1. they don&#039;t want to admit there is nothing to their left they wouldnt disagree with 2. most Americans don&#039;t buy it 3. very few people are actually watching left wing point of view news.

&lt;object width=&quot;560&quot; height=&quot;340&quot;&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/bnWVzGQA-1k&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;allowFullScreen&quot; value=&quot;true&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;allowscriptaccess&quot; value=&quot;always&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/bnWVzGQA-1k&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;&quot; type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; allowscriptaccess=&quot;always&quot; allowfullscreen=&quot;true&quot; width=&quot;560&quot; height=&quot;340&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is hilarious! A bunch of Democrat apologists first denying that MSNBC is a liberal bullhorn, then saying &#8220;hey, lets look forward, not back!&#8221;</p>
<p>Bet if I wrote a piece about all the time Obama has spent on the green hitting around a little ball in his nine months, we&#8217;d talk about all the time Bush spent on vacation instead. You people take NO time examining the veracity of your comments or opinions. You just feel them. </p>
<p>Vern, I would give you some advice in return. Start admitting that when some news sources start putting out information you don&#8217;t like, leftists attack it. Jake Tapper is probably not long for his job the way he asks real questions. </p>
<p>Hint: he&#8217;s not on Fox. </p>
<p>Admit its intellectual laziness on the part of leftists that 1. they don&#8217;t want to admit there is nothing to their left they wouldnt disagree with 2. most Americans don&#8217;t buy it 3. very few people are actually watching left wing point of view news.</p>
<p><object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/bnWVzGQA-1k&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/bnWVzGQA-1k&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://orangejuiceblog.com/2009/10/why-fox-news-isnt-actually-news-at-all/comment-page-1/#comment-109416</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=30667#comment-109416</guid>
		<description>Fox News stinks and isn&#039;t even funny.

Terry Crowley taught me how to make that argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox News stinks and isn&#8217;t even funny.</p>
<p>Terry Crowley taught me how to make that argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the great one</title>
		<link>http://orangejuiceblog.com/2009/10/why-fox-news-isnt-actually-news-at-all/comment-page-1/#comment-109412</link>
		<dc:creator>the great one</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=30667#comment-109412</guid>
		<description>ah my friend FAR LEFT VERN . YES YOUR A DEMOCRAT HACK  . a far left one if that :):):):):) fox news is number 1 so someone is watching . maddow and overbite dont even have a blip on the ratings chart .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ah my friend FAR LEFT VERN . YES YOUR A DEMOCRAT HACK  . a far left one if that <img src='http://orangejuiceblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> :):):):) fox news is number 1 so someone is watching . maddow and overbite dont even have a blip on the ratings chart .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tessa Dick</title>
		<link>http://orangejuiceblog.com/2009/10/why-fox-news-isnt-actually-news-at-all/comment-page-1/#comment-109398</link>
		<dc:creator>Tessa Dick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 06:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=30667#comment-109398</guid>
		<description>Rachel who?  I guess I don&#039;t watch enough TV.  I&#039;m too busy reading the newspaper. 
  ~~~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rachel who?  I guess I don&#8217;t watch enough TV.  I&#8217;m too busy reading the newspaper.<br />
  ~~~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vern Nelson</title>
		<link>http://orangejuiceblog.com/2009/10/why-fox-news-isnt-actually-news-at-all/comment-page-1/#comment-109394</link>
		<dc:creator>Vern Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 04:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://orangejuiceblog.com/?p=30667#comment-109394</guid>
		<description>Duane!  That&#039;s great!  But that Green maniac will be blasting me from the left though, calling me a Democrat hack.  Whatever will the Great One say?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duane!  That&#8217;s great!  But that Green maniac will be blasting me from the left though, calling me a Democrat hack.  Whatever will the Great One say?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
