data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1cf46/1cf46c0907eda7acaeef0c39f78be14963a6bdfb" alt="Occupy Fullerton gone - cropped Occupy Fullerton moves out, leaves grass that will recover"
Occupy Fullerton keeps its word: a few days at Brea Dam, then it's on to the next city to make new friends.
I was driving back from a political meeting in Fullerton Saturday evening and I decided to stop by the Occupy Fullerton encampment at the “Duck Pond”; the portion of Hillcrest Park adjacent to the corner of Harbor and Brea Boulevards. But, with the exception of a few stragglers finishing the site cleanup, it was gone. For more than a month I (and many many others) have been driving up the hill towards Brea, seeing a colorful little village of tents and signs; its absence was a shock. The tents, which bumped up to above 50 as of last weekend’s Occupalooza — a political gathering that before long just became a lot of Occupy people from as far away as Seattle having fun together — had become part of the landscape. Judging from the happy honks that the villagers would often elicit from passing drivers, far more frequently than the witticism of the day “Get a job!”, I’m not the only one who will miss them.
By the way: as we confirmed with the City weeks ago, that brown and yellow grass that you see in the photo will be fine. It just needs some watering and a little time. When the grass grows back, the implicit message of such a physical encampment to the broader community — that SOMETHING IS OUT OF PLACE, SOMETHING IS WRONG, SOMETHING NEEDS TO BE FIXED — will have been erased from Fullerton except in photographs and human memories. Fullerton will have a good story to tell; a lot of people will have learned a lot about our issues; and it will have two good new resolutions on its books, including one that will direct the city’s savings to institutions more likely to reinvest it here. Not bad for less than two months in the area!
I’ve been occupied — heh-heh — elsewhere in recent days, so while I knew that the plan was for the encampment to move out of the Duck Pond this weekend I hadn’t been paying close enough attention. I had thought that it was to happen on Sunday. But they were supposed to move out by 5 p.m. Saturday — and they did. The will spend a few days at the Brea Dam campsite up Harbor, recuperating while they continue to reconnoiter their next target, the it’s off and out of Fullerton — at least as a campsite. (Occupy protesters reserve the right to go anywhere it wants during hours when the parks aren’t closed.)
(Please mentally insert the boilerplate “I can’t officially speak for Occupy OC in these manners but …” disclaimer here.)
I know that this won’t be popular with some of our readers, but I have to be as fair with praise as I was prepared to be with criticism had things gone otherwise: the City did a great job with “enduring” us. (We’re still irked that the Council didn’t pass a resolution opposing Citizens United, but if one of the three councilmen who opposed it — all of them face elections this year — is wise, he will move to reconsider the motion even without Occupy’s further prompting.) Mayor Sharon Quirk-Silva did not want the encampment to target Fullerton, but once its arrival was a fait accompli she made the best of it, dealing with us honestly and positively but firmly. All or most of the other councilmembers visited the encampment or met with us at least once, in generally positive meetings. Chief Dan Hughes and his force “laid down the law” at the outset and we found that we could live with his restrictions; the officers that they assigned to interact with the village were positive and helpful. (Whether that is representative of the department or just a wise choice of personnel, I leave to the reader to decide; whichever it was, it worked.) And City Manager Joe Felz, whom I know takes a lot of flak in parts of the local blogosphere, and his staff were professional, creative, and supportive of our legal right to peaceful protest. (Felz was also an excellent and accessible crisis manager.) We could hardly ask for more than that.
We know from Fullerton personnel that our old friends from Irvine were good advisors to them from the outset; helping to plan strategy and reassuring them that we really were intent on being good neighbors. We appreciate that from Irvine; we’ll appreciate both Irvine and Fullerton doing the same with our next planned site. We don’t expect that city — or any city — to be enthusiastic about receiving us, but we expect them to recognize before long that it is better to work with us than to make us stand up with signs all night — which is of course itself better than pepper-spraying and arresting us. We’ve now shown that we can protest peacefully for almost five months — long enough that even most of the people who replaced those of us who had burned out have themselves burned out — and we know how to conduct ourselves. I expect that Fullerton’s government will be breathing a sign of relief at our peaceful departure, but I also expect that our presence will in retrospect be considered one of the better memories in a difficult year.
What I’m especially proud of right now, if you’ll indulge my paternal feelings as one old enough to be the parent of most Occupiers there and almost old enough to be the grandfather of some, is that the people in our movement kept their word. They left when they said they would leave; they showed responsibility and trustworthiness. How cool is that? That is not a given in these situations, but the villagers decided on their own — at a meeting that I was politely told would probably run more smoothly without my glowering and hectoring presence (or words to that effect) — that they were buying into the peaceful and lawful ethos of Occupy OC and honoring their commitments. Even people here from other Occupations, such as the guy I ran into at the (almost) empty encampment who had been with Occupy LA from the start, get it. What we’re doing has been worth doing.
The Occupy Movement would be weaker if no groups were willing to engage in civil disobedience — as, within Orange County, the somewhat independent and generally self-governing Occupy Santa Ana movement did and may at some point do again. (So may the floating encampment, if any city decides to try to prevent us from exercising our legal rights.) But the movement in Southern California is also stronger for the continued presence — and for the sheer persistence — of the Occupy Orange County model. The fact that we’re still here, still going strong, meant that people from San Diego to Los Angeles to Phoenix has a place to go, a place that (for some San Diegans) was the first one where they could, even after months of activism, actually sleep for the night in a tent as part of our public protest. (San Diego’s reception of Occupation has not been a welcoming one.) In a nation where most Occupy encampments went into hibernation for the winter, due to weather and/or police clampdowns, the fact that our blade of grass still shows through the sidewalk cracks matters to people. We’ve carried the torch almost to Spring.
I hope that, as Occupy moves on this week to a location that I cannot yet disclose, we can keep up that track record. And we here in Orange County have some things planned that you will not believe — but that is a story for another time. Those of you in that new city — and the only thing I’ll say is that we’re honoring our promise that it will not be Irvine — come check us out. For now: the Occupation continues.
I think it is adorable that the author considers himself or the occupy movement relevant. There is no cohesive message and in years from now will be looked upon as a barely organized homeless gathering. Politicians tolerate your persistence only out of fear you will move your smelly encampment to their office. Good riddance and, as they say, GET A JOB!
I think it’s adorable that you think that telling people to “get a job” gets them jobs without displacing other people currently in those jobs. If you want people — and most of us in the movement have jobs, thanks — to have jobs, tell the Republicans in Congress to stop blocking jobs programs.
I also think it’s adorable that by criticizing the cohesiveness of our message you judge us by the standards of a political campaign rather than a popular movement. But, for the record, aside from the 23 grievances I have stashed around here somewhere, it’s roughly this: (1) cutting back on the corrosive effect of private interest money in politics (both in lobbying and campaign expenditures), (2) protection of the interests of the 99% of the population with the lowest wealth and income from the attempts of the top 1% to rig the system and its benefits in their favor, and (3) eliminating corruption in the financial services industry. Do any of those shock you?
There’s plenty more, and all of which are about as cohesive as what you see from political parties, religions, and other such movements, but those three are consistently at the fore.
How often did you visit the Fullerton encampment, by the way? I’ll admit that there was an unusual amount of incense there at times.
lol get a job… you want to know a secret about 75% of the OOC occupiers? that 75% of us come from 1% backgrounds… AND HAVE JOBS… The most amusing thing ever is when the Doctors, Attorneys, Police Officers, Fire Fighters, EMT’s, Taxi Drivers, Teachers, Crystal Danglers, Students, Janitors, Disney workers, Denny’s workers, Plumbers, Shop owners, Coal Miners, Gold diggers, and Baby sitters are all standing on the corners and YOU drive by and scream… “Get a Job” when in fact, most of us have 3… You sir, are the lowest of all people on this planet… You treat those under you as cockroaches, where as you should be helping them up… You can judge a persons character by how they treat those who have nothing to offer them… I have plenty to offer you, and yet you treat me and my family of occupiers as if we are or have a problem… for shame on you! for shame! I hope that one day YOU have grand kids and they ask you what you did for the occupy movement in america… I hope you have an answer that doesn’t make you look like a total feminine hygiene product…
@Joe
Occupy was the official “word of the year” last year and the protester Time’s “person of the year.”
You will continue to learn just how relevant this movement is, whatever future names and mergers it undergoes.
ps – the vast majority of people I know in Occupy work quite hard. you’re welcome for taking our free time to advocate for a better future for all, including ingrates such as yourself.
Middle-aged, greying 1960s radicals, pimply faced kids, teachers, throngs of SEIU members, angry Occupy protestors, and union members of all kinds descended upon the state Capitol Monday. They demanded (the usual shit).
The protest was sponsored by the California Teachers Association and the Occupy movement.
The protest even included roving bands of gang-attired youth probably not connected to education, dreadlock-wearing Rastafarians, earth children and the unmistakable sweet smell of marijuana wafting about.
Vapid stares, body odor, anger and an abundant use of the “F” word, some attended the rally with an express purpose in mind, while others appeared less committed and just were there for the chanting and day off of school.
“Enough is enough,” came the rally cry from college student body presidents. “We stand in solidarity,” said one speaker as Che Guevara signs waived wildly.
Che Guevara ……………….
http://www.calwatchdog.com/2012/03/05/students-protest-education-entitlement-cuts/?utm_source=CalWatchdog+March+6%2C+2012&utm_campaign=CALWATCHDOG+EBLAST&utm_medium=email
Well, that discredits everything that’s good in the world, doesn’t it? Body odor! Mercy!
For what it’s worth, I think that young people overromanticize Che, and have done so even before I entered college. But there are bigger problems in the world than that. One, for example, is stupid interviewers who elicit vapid stares and think that they’re intrinsic to their interview subject rather than to the situation of facing vapid questions.
This Grimes woman that Scallywag quotes came into this event with a head full of cliches, and looking around the crowd long enough, she found enough to support her cliches. We learned nothing.
My piece “Vern’s Report on the Tea Party,” coming from the opposite direction, was much more fair and balanced and educational.
http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2010/07/verns-report-from-the-tea-party/
“.. I think that young people overromanticize Che ..”
Really?? Ya think??
Che Guevara, as (Castro’s) chief executioner, relished the slaughter. You could see it in his face as he watched men yanked from their cells and tied to the execution stake.”
Che also loved toying with the distraught and sobbing mothers who came into his La Cabana office to plead for their (innocent) son’s lives. He loved to pick up the phone right in front of them and bark” “Execute the Fernandez (or whoever) boy tonight!” As Mr Martin-Perez concluded: “There was something seriously, seriously wrong with Che Guevara.” Alas, Che’s sadism found a useful outlet as Castro’s chief hangman.
http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=26996
And that’s why you never see ME wearing a Che t-shirt. Although, I did go meta one Christmas, and purchased as gifts, from the Onion, several “Che Wearing Che T-Shirt T-Shirts.”
Sure,
You carry his name!…. Why?
You idolize Brown who unlawfully visited Fidel….. Why?
You applaud when Brown drives California into a ground….. Why?
You applaud when Obama hates Jews….. Why?
Yes, ah think! Then again, maybe you don’t romanticize him at all; I don’t know how you feel (or felt!) about the Bautista regime.
I certainly had more respect for him early in his life than there at the end — as, from what I understand, did Fidel! — but he’s not the first person whom power corrupted badly.
I’m glad to see your interest in international human rights and in preventing torture; I hope that you apply it evenhandedly and everywhere.
“I certainly had more respect for him (Che) early in his life than there at the end ..”
Yeah Greg – and I am sure that Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot and Mao had a fuzzy warm side to offset their megalomaniac mass-murderer tendancies as well.
You’re sure? Why are you sure?
Did Bautista have his fuzzy warm side as well? How about Papa Doc?
This seems like a silly conversation, skally.
What a lawyer?
What a law school did you attend?
What a bar did you pass?
Person is guilty based on his final action not on his prior innocents.
absolutely inaccurate and out-of-context “take down” of che and (much more importantly) misunderstanding of what he represents to those (not me btw) who use him as a symbol, particularly in the third world.
but coming from a guy who thinks the first radical movement of our generation that has seen mass support from ordinary americans is primarily remarkable because it includes people with dreadlocks, I think a history lesson would be a waste of time here.
just to leave it at this, che’s views on politics and revolution were formed most concretely when he was in guatemala around the time the cia and its local rich proxies overthrew an FDRish democracy to place the country in decades of death-squad torture dictatorship with a quarter million people in the smallish country killed and a million fleeing into exile.
similar situations happened in many other Latin American countries. why do I have a feeling you’re probably totally cool with that?
anyway, it’s what led che and others to take the “heavy handed” route to trying to make their revolution, which could’ve won a real election at the time, stick. definite mixed feelings about it on my part, the same as even many who participated in it and lived to see the aftermath.
the question is, what do we want for the future… your implication that Occupy protesters etc want to execute the rich and so on would make you a psychopath if I believed for a second that you actually believed it yourself.
Hey From the Exile, why don’t you go over to the State Bar of CA website and look up Greg Diamond in their database for yourself, huh? In case you didn’t know, the Bar has an online database with all the CA lawyers:
http://members.calbar.ca.gov/fal/MemberSearch/QuickSearch
I looked him up, he’s in there. He’s a real lawyer.
I am? Um, I mean, um, I AM!
(Good hacking, Anonymous!)