Southern California Edison announced this morning that San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS), which has been closed since January 2012, will not reopen.
The announcement that Unit 2 and Unit 3 reactors will retire was made by Southern California Edison early Friday.
The company cited “continuing uncertainty about when or if SONGS might return to service” as the cause for their decision.
Edison International CEO Ted Craver said the company concluded that questions over when or if the plant might return to service was not good for customers or investors.
It will take years to retire the units. The company said it’s “top priority will be to ensure a safe, orderly, and compliant retirement” of these two reactors.
We’ll have more on the story as we can mentally process it. Meanwhile, there’s this:
UPDATE, 6/7, 1:30 p.m.: OK, it’s no longer morning, and we’re still not yet alert, so we’re just going to hand the mike over to Harvey Wasserman of Alternet for four — oh, let’s make it eight, since they’re calling for us to celebrate! — short paragraphs of fair use:
Germany is shutting its entire fleet and switching to renewables. France, once the poster child for the global reactor industry, is following suit. South Korea has just shut three due to fraudulent safety procedures. Massive demonstrations rage against reactors being built in India. Only the Koreans, Chinese and Russians remain at all serious about pushing ahead with this tragic technology.
Cheap gas has undercut the short-term market for expensive electricity generated by obsolete coal and nuke burners. But the vision of Solartopia—a totally green-powered Earth—is now our tangible long-term reality.
With falling prices and soaring efficiency, every moving electron our species consumes will be generated by a solar panel, wind turbine, bio-fueled or geothermal generator, wave machine and their green siblings.
As of early this year, Southern California Edison’s path to a re-start at San Onofre seemed as clear as any to be expected by a traditional atomic tyrannosaur.But with help from Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and Senator-to-be Ed Markey (D-MA), a powerful citizen uprising stopped it dead.
…
Make no mistake—this double victory at San Onofre is a falling domino. Had the public not fought back, those reactors would have been “fixed” at public expense.
Today, they are dead.
Worldwide, there are some 400 to go. Each of them—including the 100 remaining in the US—could do apocalyptic damage. We still have our work cut out for us.
But a huge double-step has been taken up the road to Solartopia. There will be no Fukushimas at San Onofre. A green-powered Earth is that much closer. And we have yet another proof that citizen action makes all the difference in our world.
Meanwhile, the Democratic Party of Orange County (currently being reviled elsewhere in these pages) issued the following statement:
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station to Shut Down
Santa Ana, California – 6/7/2013 – Southern California Edison (SCE) announced today its plan to retire Units 2 and 3 of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station in Southern Orange County. This will effectively shut down the entire plant. The plant has not produced electricity since January of 2012, following the discovery of broken water tubes and premature wear. Significant job layoffs are imminent, but SCE will collaborate with the Utility Workers Union of America and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers to ensure a smooth transition for their workers.“While the Democratic Party of Orange County (DPOC) is concerned about the 1100 working families that will be impacted by this decision, we applaud SCE’s commitment to ensuring the safety of the surrounding communities. We are hopeful that SCE will be equally diligent in facilitating the transition of the workers to new jobs,” said DPOC Chair, Henry Vandermeir.The past 16 months of battle over whether to return the units to use have come to an end, and the plant will close. Concerns regarding the design and fear of earthquakes and similarities to the Fukushima-Daiichi disaster also furthered concern, as more than 7.4 million Californians live within 50 miles of the plant.The city of Riverside, San Diego Gas & Electric, and Southern California Edison are the joint-owners of San Onofre. The next step will be to safely shut down and retire all units, which will be monitored by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Nice and even-handed — yes, the consequences for jobs are a big priority, but SCE is going to be generating energy somehow, and those electrical workers are going to be one of their best assets in making it happen.
Having been one of the small group doing the heavy lifting within the county party on our resolutions to shut down SONGS, I can tell you that the Democratic Party did not want to poke its fingers in the eye of either SCE or the IBEW. Yes, we do need energy; yes, we do need jobs. Our recent Executive Board resolution on the issue came out only after a long conversation with an SCE spokesperon who gave us a good and measured presentation. And the members of the party don’t like opposing the IBEW’s concerns and don’t do it likely. But the environmental and the consumer concerns here were simply overriding — and the chance of successfully restarting the reactor was, in any case, slim. The question was how to let it go with relative peace and dignity. I’m glad that we took a stand — and I hope that, in some small way, it helped resolve this.
I’ll happily append comments from the Greens, Libertarians, and Republicans as well — if they come forth.
One question for those in the know:
The linked story above says that the number of employees will be reduced from 1500 to 400 by the end of the year. Have 1500 people at San Onofre truly been getting paid daily by So Cal Edison since January 2012? For what?
I want the SCE stockholders to pay the cost of decommissioning and lower the rates we have been paying for the future cost of decommissioning to be unwound.
We need the rates to be lowered to similar rates as being paid by electricity consumers in other states.
We used to pay about 8 Cents/kwh. Now it’s more like 28 Cents/kwh- check your bill.
We are paying the highest electric rates in the world.
Now our rates are going to go even higher. Electricity rates and supply will be scary this year without SONGS.
You do realize that SONGS didn’t generate any electricity last summer either, right?
We need to move hard into renewables. The technology has gotten there.
That will be the big fight. The main thing about them not getting to start up is that now it’s going to be hard to shunt the cost of Mitsubishi’s failed generators onto ratepayers.
I am pretty sure that we are not paying the highest electric rates in the world, no matter how often you say that.
Ya know, Greg, if you were lucky enough to live in Anaheim the highest rates you can pay according to their rate sheets is 13.11 cents/Kwh.
Compare that to my SCE bill, where the rates are as high as 31 cents/Kwh. I am at 29 cents/Kwh, which is the third of 4 tiers based on usage. And guess what? I live alone. One person in the house.
It’s just out of control. There are people in the US who pay in the 5 cent range.
Why are we getting ripped so bad?
Because of the nuclear decommissioning charge and the failed deregulation plan, which was written by San Diego Democrat Steve Piece.
I am not going to defend Steve Pierce, who did whatever he did during the two decades when I lived out of state. Deregulation is usually (and still) a Republican obsession. If he’s a business-friendly Democrat who allowed people to paint a failed policy as Democratic, when without looking at a single vote I’d bet that it was more strongly supported by Republicans (unless it contained something else objectionable to them like a prohibition on usury) than by Democrats, you can probably infer from my attitudes towards local politicians how I’d feel about him.
But hey, you look like an expert on this: what was the partisan breakdown of the vote on energy deregulation?
So HAPPY!!!! See IT WORKS… the PEOPLE spoke and “they” listened. Democracy in action!
What is this obsession with bras???
Well, see, the twin globes of SONGS give the appearance of being mammary-like, an effect enhanced by each of them having a large red-colored, nipple-shaped protrusion in the middle pointing skyward. They are now being covered up. Do the math.
Inge: this cartoon is for your edification!
http://media.ocweekly.com/8854775.0.jpg
This bit from the Weekly is pretty funny: http://blogs.ocweekly.com/navelgazing/2013/06/san_onofre_nuclear_generating_4.php.
Unfortunately, two of the proposals appended by Moxley, “7) South County can finally get its own jail” and “8) Whatever, just put Ronald Reagan’s name on it” seem perfectly plausible.