I’ve started a scorecard on recommendations for the 5/19 Propositions, and note that Larry Gilbert’s No on Everything camp has now become a tent so big as to include conservative talk radio icons John & Ken, the California Republican Party, and the Green Party. Other OJ bloggers besides me and Larry seem hesitant to post recommendations, although it is hard to imagine something more relevant than something where we actually do get a vote.
I believe I also figured out where I went wrong on trying to read 1D. The unrestriction on the not-to-replace funding concept applies to carry-over funds, as well as reduction in the ad budget in favor of unrestricted. Thus the hand-wringing over first-5 programs losing a statutory entitlement to priority on tobacco tax funds.
Here’s how the recommendations break down so far:
1A 1B 1C 1D 1E 1F
Ron St. John No No No Yes Yes Yes
Larry Gilbert No No No No No No
Dem Party NP Yes Yes NP NP Yes
Rep Party No No No No No No
Lib Party No No No No No Yes
Green Party No No No No No No
Sac Bee Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes
LA Times Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
SEIU No Yes Yes No No No
Cal Teachers Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
LA Times, Teachers, Dem party all wanting to screw over the people, just to line their own pockets. YOU SHOULD ALL BE ASHAMED.
NO NO NO NO ON EVERYTHING!! STICK IT TO THE THEM!!
Can we vote HELL NO?
HELL NO!! ON YOUR CAR LIKE MINE:)
I agree with #1. Shame on Sac Bee, LA Times & Cal Teachers. What a bunch of greedy bastards. Taking away from children and the mentally ill is morally wrong. VOTE NO ON 1D & 1E.
no no no send them a message . the teachers union , dems , la times , all the usual supects who want to suck more money out of us . NO MORE