Anaheim City Council Candidate Bill Dalati is the “Anti-Mansoor”

Bill Dalati is just one of many candidates running for a seat on the Anaheim city council this November. The former Republican is an insurance agent and a Muslim Arab-American of Syrian birth. Followers of Anaheim’s local political scene will remember that Dalati re-registered and joined the Democratic Party in 2006 because apparently his chosen faith and place of birth were issues of contention for former State Republican Party Chair Shawn Steel who characterized the candidate as an “Islamic Extremist.” Had Dalati simply stated in a blog post that though he was born in Syria, both he and his father were greatly influenced by European culture, perhaps he could have become the darling of bigots in and outside of the GOP instead like Arab-Swedish-American Allan Mansoor. Dalati, however, made no such effort to deny his heritage and, as such, is the ‘anti-Mansoor.’

Being so in 2006,  Dalati lost and faced undue scrutiny during his campaign. Prior to the press release announcing the move to switch parties, Dalati was given an unfair lashing in print by the Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles which also took shots at the Los Angeles Times in the process – all in service of expanding the case against the candidate beyond Steel’s stupidity. In an article by Steven Emerson on October 16th, 2006, Dalati was criticized for his attendance at an Anaheim rally against the summer conflict that year between Israel and Lebanon. First the author noted the then- characterization of the gathering by Dalati in the Associated Press as ‘anti-war.’ Then, in statements to the Los Angeles Times regarding his attendance, he went on to say, “I’m not against Jews or Christians … I don’t support Hezbollah. I just don’t believe wars solve any issues; love does.”

Rather than take the man for his wise words, the JJ played guilt by association. The rally became ‘anti-Israel’ and by extension so did Dalati. If that is the case, then everyone who has every attended a gathering denouncing a war the United States has been involved in is “anti-American” though they are exercising their right to free speech. Israel received copious aid from the U.S. government at the time of the conflict so the citizens of this country could protest the conflict through demands aimed at that relationship if they had sought to do so – especially when American munitions were destroying Beirut. That’s not to say Dalati did or didn’t. In any regard, the guilt by association argument was weak. It’s not as if Dalati went to a pro-Hezbollah gathering or anything explicit to that extent.

Four years ago, I also attended that very same rally in Anaheim. In every rally I’ve ever attended, there have always been folks present with different agendas and policy critiques that I don’t share. That doesn’t make my or Dalati’s attendance to any such event synonymous with anything that can be found and thus exploited for political purposes. One would have to go to an extreme standard to insinuate such as it is politically immature. I, in writing this, probably do not agree with Dalati on a great many things pertaining to local and international affairs yet four years ago we were at the same protest without knowing each other (we still don’t) Even this blog post should not be seen in such a light. We must be more discriminating in our intellectual dialogue on political affairs.

To continue in that task, the city council candidate was also criticized by Steel and the JJ for contributing to then-Democrat Cynthia McKinney and for having a relationship with the Council on American-Islamic Relations – with the JJ going so far to make an unfair analogy between Congresswoman McKinney, an African-American woman, and a truly fringe fanatic white supremacist racist like David Duke! The relevancy in rehashing all of this is that, of course, it may all come up again as Dalati seeks office once more in 2010. Sadly, however, a skirmish on August 3rd has resurrected fears of a new conflict between Israel and Lebanon. Should that take place – and let’s hope that it does not – Dalati should have every right to attend a rally and express his humanistic dissatisfaction.

With that understanding, we can go about the task of exploring what ideas, policy proposals and stances Dalati would bring to Anaheim if elected to the city council. This is much more important and relevant.

About Gabriel San Roman