On this Labor Day, I recall the controversial Preamble to the Constitution of the Industrial Workers of the World that held right at the onset that the “working class and employing class have nothing in common.” A bit Manichean? Perhaps, but when juxtaposed with the OC Register’s profile of Orange County Labor Federation Executive Tefere Gebre, it at least harks back to an antagonistic orientation with some rhetorical teeth behind it. Instead, what we have is a headline in the September 6th edition of the paper reading “Labor’s man in OC out to save capitalism!”
In the profile, Gebre recounts his life in Ethopia where his father once met Hallie Selassie, the emperor who would later be overthrown by Marxist-Leninists. Life under the authoritarian socialist regime spurred Gebre’s decision to come to the United States. This aspect is almost suggested to properly contextualize Gebre’s pro-union/pro-capitalist stance. To be certain, Marxist-Leninist regimes architecturally betrayed socialism with their state capitalist economies and undemocratic political structures. Indeed, as radical theorist Noam Chomsky has noted, the collapse of the Soviet Union – where Gebre was educated – and its Eastern bloc should have been celebrated by the left as the end of a major impediment to its truer aims.
In a sense, however, what is being presented is a false dichotomy full of contradictions. The first is a quote from the OCLF’s ED that will rankle left and right alike when he said, “I’m the purest capitalist you could find anywhere.” As Reggie writer David Whiting went to write on, “But, he explains, that doesn’t mean he’s in favor of unchecked capitalism.” Pure capitalists are the anarcho-capitalist types. They rarely exist and when they do proclaim themselves to be, they usually act in contradiction to their professed faith. Gebre is not of such ilk and can’t claim such an ideological purity and then favor regulation! Checks on the system recognizes its shortcomings – especially when it comes to labor – and perhaps one day Gebre might figure out the Sisyphusean nature of his efforts.
Next, towards the article’s end, more statements are offered for analysis:
The movement’s immediate goal is to elect leaders who will stop the drop in what Gebre says is a nearly 40-year decline in pay. “We need to create 11 million jobs just to catch up,” Gebre says of the recession. He offers high speed rail jobs as one solution – and ridding the White House of Goldman Sachs advisers.
With the November election looming, Gebre’s offices in Orange are abuzz. His members have registered 37,000 voters in the last three years. There’s a war room with charts of target cities and computers stuffed with data on union members and voting patterns. “We will man 64 phone lines every night between September 7th and November 2nd,” Gebre promises. “We will have 300 people walking the streets of Anaheim on Election Day helping get out the vote.”
There is no doubt helping “fix” capitalism, as Gebre puts it, is an ambitious goal.
Firstly, wage stagnation is the outcome of a neoliberal economic consensus that has been in effect since the 1970’s. Leaders who would be well poised to reverse that trend do not come from the Democratic Party – or else they would have already done it. Bill Clinton’s presidency presided over NAFTA devastating the manufacturing base and his neoliberal economic team helped blow a bubble that burst in the first years of the Dubya presidency. The Bush Administration oversaw the blowing of bigger bubbles that have now burst and wrecked the economy in a Great Recession. Obama’s White House, where all those Goldman Sachs advisers kick it, has delivered his Wall Street campaign donors with nice bailouts while hardly anyone mentions EFCA much these days. Gebre can man the phones, register the voters, and seek to “fix” capitalism, but what party will he turn to in order to faithfully execute these objectives?
It’s as critical historian of the Democratic Party Lance Selfa once put it, “you can’t fight the victory of the rightmost forces by sacrificing your own independent strength to support elements just the next step away from them.”
That being said, and this being OC and all, Gebre’s political economy outlook is just enough to rile the readers of the Reggie though. Case in point with the following comment: “Fixing capitalism with a union? How does a socialist organization fix capitalism? Oh yeah, I forgot, the union bosses make millions by enslaving the masses to the union cause. Just like corporate America. Same america, just a different dictator.”
Ay dios mio! Happy Labor Day?
You bring up something that doesn’t fit onto my new pattern of Progressives / Labor / rightwing Zealots:
The neoliberal policies of DLC & Clinton – in which their actions fell even to the right of the reactionary Labor Democrats. What a mess, my Party.
Corporate Dems are as misguided and selfish as their GOP counterparts.
This guy can work the phones all he wants, but at the end of the day labor got behind a Republican stooge in John Leos and ignored two good progressives in John Santoianni and Bill Dalati.
Santoianni by the way works in Anaheim, at a hotel. Leos? A government worker.
Dalati runs an insurance agency.
Voters would be better served by voting for a businessman or a worker than a county probation officer who supports the death penalty and believes in unfettered gun rights…
You are making the mistake that many Dems make, in considering Organized Labor as being out for anything other than the progressing of their goals. Which is completely fine, that’s thier deal, but don’t expect them to pick thier candidates with any other goal in mind other than advancing their agenda. Isn’t that what ever political organization does? Don’t consider Labor to be any different because they are not.
Luke,
But is OC labor realizing their goals? They seem to lose consistently.
You should ask Lorraine Galloway how effective they are.
Wow. “unfettered gun rights….” I never read that on his website or heard any statements made to that effect. Have your recent legal troubles taught you nothing about libel laws?
That is what Leos told our editor on Saturday.
You need to read your own blog. Vern asked him the question and before Leos could respond he was interrupted with another coversation. Tsk tsk tsk. Will you never learn?
Realist,
Here is what Vern wrote:
The first two issues he came up with were his strong support of the death penalty, and fierce opposition to gun control. As a firearms enthusiast he really resents the new law (from Nava I think?) making him jump through some more hoops, including giving fingerprints, each time he wants to buy ammo; like he says, the crooks don’t have to bother with such niceties. Of course I told him there are plenty of Dem politicians who agree with him on those issues for what it’s worth. He is a “second amendment absolutist.”
A second amendment absolutist? That sure sounds like unfettered gun rights to me.
Did labor even ask him about his stand on gun rights before they endorsed him?
Tell me “Realist” what races has labor won in the OC in the past five years?
Was Vern meaning to attribute the “second amendant absolutist” as a direct quote for Leos? And I seem to remember Labor helping with an IE against a Santa Ana City Council candidate a few years back. How did that work out?
Realist,
How did it work out? Well, how are all these posts working out for Berardino and company? Time to stop giving them free passes! Their record sucks, period. Tell me again what electoral victories they can claim in the past five years.
As for that hit piece, it helped Carlos Bustamante get reelected. He is now campaigning for Van Tran against Loretta Sanchez. I hope Berardino is proud of what he did.
Why would Labor ask about his stance on gun rights? How is that a Labor issue?
Realist,
Am I to believe that union members and their families are bullet-proof? Really?
Perhaps a little more independent research is called for from this blogger, as he simply rehashes that Tefere was educated in the Soviet Union. Tefere also received an education and degree from UCLA, a very US-style institution. There’s like half as many communist there.
I stated it as a matter of fact, not to add anything extra to it. What’s your point?
I didn’t even bother delving into the AFL-CIO’s historical hall of shame. I’ll leave that you your own independent research “Luke”
My point is that your a Gustavo Wanna-be!
lol No actually my real point is that while you try to support your findings* with random shit like Tefere being educated in the Soviet Union, when you then fail to mention that his higher education took place in a highly regarded US school, the same one that educated your idol and master, you show yourself to find facts in support of your little theorems, instead of letting the facts help you formulate them.
(I attached an asterisk next to that because I seriously doubt you can ‘find’ your way out of a closet, much less glean information from something accurately)
Lame. You’re the one who calls Loretta Sanchez “Queen Bee.” You should not be giving advice or taunting someone about idolatry! You exude it to new heights on the blogosphere, Luke!
Gebre was educated in the Soviet Union was he not? That was a part of the OC Reggie profile. I put it between the hyphens as I was making a point about the Soviet Union.
If you think that the UCLA education was an intentional flub of propaganda – let me grab my bullhorn – HEY EVERYONE, GEBRE GOT A DEGREE AT UCLA, HE WAS A BRUIN TOO!
Ok, so what does that prove? That he’s U.S. educated as well and comes to these terrible political calculations anyway?
Who’s this pathetic, obsessive weirdo? Is it really Steve Perez?
Realist et al, he did say he was a “second amendment absolutist,” I meant those quote marks to be from him. Then he took a minute, and couldn’t think of an answer, when I asked if there was ANY gun control he agreed with.
I agree that that’s not a Labor issue. It’s an issue with SOME liberals, but then there are lots of Democrats, AND liberals, who love their guns. I wasn’t really trying to make John look bad, I was just trying to see how much of a “Republican” he is and in what way. Too bad we were interrupted. I’m wondering now about women’s reproductive rights.
Then on the other hand these are issues that probably aren’t that important in a city councilman’s job description. And then on the OTHER OTHER hand (as Tevye would say) little city councilmen often grow up to be big Supervisors, assemblymen and Congressmen. Real dangerous ones should be nipped in the bud.
I could probably follow up on these questions if people care so much. Because since writing that article I’m suddenly getting his e-mails. Andrew Gibson in his office wants me to know that he’s hit the trifecta now with the OCEA endorsement. I know, bowl me over with a feather, huh?
That’s probably the kind of burning news that’s already on the Liberal OC. Although this time will John be praising OCEA for their conservative positions, like he did with Lou and Jose? Let’s go see!
Wow! Not yet. What’s keeping Chris? I thought they were the Labor blog! I hope he’s okay.
Oh, I know. Those other press releases were fed directly from Leos to Chris. As commenter Luis (who seems to know things) said on my post, John doesn’t like to talk much about his union connections; and doesn’t owe OCEA big time like he owes Jose and Lou. So nothing will be forthcoming I guess.
Speaking of Gebre, he’s quoted in the latest Press Release OC blog in support of Leos, “As the job engine of Orange County, what Anaheim does has a great effect on the lives of working men and women. The Orange County Labor Federation enthusiastically supports John Leos for City Council because our members believe in him.”
Give me a break Gebre! How about something more substantive than “our members believe in him.” Show me a council member candidate that’s been supportive of the hotel resort workers fight for a contract for years — and not just when election time comes calling. Pictures of the protests made it into the print of this month’s Progressive Magazine. Nah, everyone’s too busy kissing SOAR’s ass.
It’s one thing for OCLF and OCEA to support Leos, technically and practically, Labor is not bound to Democrats in any way, but it is just sad that Correa, Solorio, and even Joe Dunn are supporting him.
So we have a Republican with support from Labor and Democrats, and we have two candidates that will be endorsed by the Rep Party, and we have the women obsessed with Mexicans and their shopping carts, Gail Eastman all who stand a chance at winning a seat. Gail has one locked up, but who will the other one go too? I’m thinking Murrey or Leos.
Labor is indeed not bound to Democrats in any respect. In fact, they should demand more of the party so as to not take their votes/support for granted. Since that’s largely not the case, Correa, Solorio, Dunn, and OCLF can all back Leos without fear of much retribution, because, after all, where are unions going to go? The Liberal OC just issues press releases on this messy endorsements and doesn’t in any meaningful way attempt to stem the rightward shift in the Party with analysis or criticism.
Anaheim deserves better. Political institutions are ensuring that the opposite occurs.
Nice, Gabo. Where do Dalati and Santo stand on that? Do you know?
I think that John and Bill are Democrats. Enough is not yet known about their political stances to effectively label them progressive. (In fact, from Santoainni strikes me as a moderate Dem who looks left only in comparison to Leos)
Well, that is obviously our job, Gabo. They’re sure not doing it at the supposedly Blue Blog. Will you call and interview them or should I? You know the Anaheim issues.
If one or both of them support the hotel workers, it would be great to have them on one of our radio shows soon.
this wouldn’t even qualify as ‘trade-union consciousness’ it’s a whole ‘nother level of perversion!