As Orange Juice Blog noted in its Pulitzer-Prize winning (or so we anticipate) coverage of the political strategy behind the AD-65 election, the race will likely be decided based on how well Sharon Quirk-Silva can activate voters “south of the freeways” — southern Buena Park, La Palma, Cypress, Stanton, and most of all West Anaheim. Quirk-Silva will unveil her approach to that election tomorrow, July 1, with the grand opening of her campaign office at 1660 W. Lincoln in Anaheim (just east of Euclid.) Quirk-Silva shares the office with Rep. Loretta Sanchez, who has gone from represented a sliver of Anaheim to all of the Anaheim Flats.
(By the way, “Anaheim Flats” only has 338 hits on Google right now — most of them referring to the British term for “apartment” rather than as the counterpart to the Anaheim Hills. Especially with the new ACLU lawsuit to force Anaheim into districts, more about which later, Orange Juice Blog dedicates itself to upping that number considerably between now and November. Also, as a matter of full disclosure, the author of this piece is running for State Senate in a district that overlaps all of AD-65 except for most of Buena Park, and supports the Congressional candidacies of Jay Chen, Linda Sanchez, and Alan Lowenthal, who between them cover the rest of the district.)
Quirk-Silva lost to incumbent Chris Norby in her primary, in which she did not campaign, by about 9000 votes, roughly 30,000 to 21,000. Looking at the numbers city by city, though, one sees nothing but upside for her.
Fullerton had an especially high 29.33% turnout, despite the recall election coming when the students at its colleges were out on summer vacation, with Norby outpolling Quirk Silva by 11,867 to 8,118, or 59.4%. This result was of course fueled by the Fullerton Recall, which added votes to Bushala ally Norby’s side of the ledger. In November, there will be no recall, the students will be back, the new Fullerton Council majority will have had its own chance to piss off the electorate, and the Presidential election will draw out many more voters, especially Democrats who didn’t come out this time. Quirk-Silva doesn’t need to win Fullerton to win the election, she just needs to hold her own. If she can get Norby’s 59.4% down to 55% or so, she can make up the difference elsewhere.
Anaheim: If you want to see evidence for Quirk-Silva’s chances, look no further. Anaheim had a miserable 19.79% turnout — and this is before the massive voter registration efforts that you can expect to see there over the next few months — which won’t be the case in November. Norby won the city 5,680 to 4,418. Democrats come out for Presidential elections. The question is whether Anaheim, without about 17,000 fewer registered voters than Fullerton, can counteract it. Don’t expect Norby’s extreme libertarianism to play well here!
Buena Park: 20.91% turnout; Norby led 4,433 to 2,977. Again, fertile territory for registering and turning out Democrats and independents.
Cypress: Somewhat neutral territory for the two candidates. Turnout was 27.78% — again, with college out of session — and Norby won 4,440 to 2,582. This is one of the cities where Alan Lowenthal’s district overlaps with AD-65 — and he should have some money to spend on turnout!
La Palma: Much like Cypress, 26.93% turnout, Norby won 1,329 to 867. Quirk-Silva’s secret weapon here? Linda Sanchez, who is a sure bet in her new 38th Congressional district, has La Palma as well. She could conceivably pour her resources into Democratic turnout in La Palma. (Why not? It would make her sister happy!)
Stanton: Stanton had a respectable 22.56% turnout, probably due in part to an important ballot proposition there. Norby prevailed 1,573 to 1,484. Still, I think that Stanton is fertile territory for a Democrat — possibly because I out-polled my opponent Bob Huff there 1,566 to 1,444! (The difference there is likely due to Norby’s greater OC name recognition compared to Huff’s.)
It’s reasonable to consider Stanton as essentially combined with West Anaheim for purposes of this district, with their combined registration equal to that of Fullerton. If Quirk-Silva can hold off Norby in Fullerton — and she has a perfect platform from which to criticize the new Fullerton City Council majority’s overreach — and build up support in Anaheim Stanton — she can offset him there. North Buena Park is much like Fullerton and South Buena Park is much like West Anaheim; call that a draw too. That would leave the election to be determined by Cypress and La Palma — not exactly libertarian revolutionary paradise!
This will be a fascinating race to watch this year — and the best view of it starts tomorrow, at 1660 Lincoln Ave in Anaheim, from 1:00 to 3:00!
*Better get down there for a Campaign Button….it is bound to be a collectible! Sadly,
SQS ain’t no Loretta. 2ndly, SQS has too much unfinished business in Fullerton Indian Land. The three old Recalled guys…aren’t going quietly into the night. They are hanging around and trying their best to mess with the system. Hopefully, the meeting on July 2nd, will oust those losers. Meanwhile, installing the new replacement troops is going to be a real job…..especially if SQS is busy Campaigning when she should be having endless meetings in closed session with the entire new City Council. They still need to replace the City Manager, find a new Police Chief and run through and squeeze the bad folks out of City Government. This couldn’t be a better time and it will require both Bruce and SQS to bring the water to a boil. The new guys can’t start taking heat right out of the box….that would be totally unfair to them and the citizens that voted them in.
Poor judgment is hard to overcome. The Cherokee Solution does not apply in this case: Remember; when the oil rich Indians of Oklahoma bought new cars and then when the car ran out of gas….went out and bought a new one!?
Fixing Fullerton without SQS running interference with Ron Thomas at her side…is not going to work so well – at least in our opinion!
I acknowledge your disagreement with Sharon’s running in AD-65, but it’s too late, ‘Ships: she’s on the ballot and so can’t run for Council.
The three old guys are gone. If one of them doesn’t show up to certify the election on July 2, then the new crew will be able to ask a judge to order them to do it once I think 30 days have passed after the election. (Not sure exactly when.)
SQS and Chaffee are a powerless minority on the Council right now. Any time that Whitaker, Sebourn, and Kiger way to bowl right over them, they can. She is not “required” to “bring the water to a boil”; I have my doubts as to whether she will even retain the Mayor’s position. After all, the new majority is tightly bound to Norby — and they’d probably like to take away that title from her.
Ron Thomas endorsed Norby well before the recall election. What makes you think that would-be “directly elected Mayor of Fullerton” would be standing by her side? Sorry, but things look different up here than they do by the foggy shore.
I’m from the generation when making jokes about ethnic groups began to be considered unacceptable, so I’ll have to run your history lesson past a Cherokee to get their reaction. I can say that I’ve heard that same joke about people from Corona del Mar!
Yo, yo, something’s missing in this announcement – oh I know! I’M PLAYING PIANO THERE! Got my keyboard and amp all packed and ready to go……….
(Note to Sharon: now that this news is out, attendance may double, so order extra food!)
Dr. D., Actually not a joke about the Oklahoma Cherokee…..and we are the farthest
thing from anti Native American anything. There was book in bad old days that was
actually required reading here in the Golden State in the 50’s and 60’s….called Cimmaron. The movie of the same name even used that scene……. So, politically correct as you are……..history ain’t bad either.
You love to keep folding the Fullerton Tent over SQS….by saying that she is already
on the ballot and can’t change nothing! She could easily file as a write-in and be re=-elected without a sweat. Sorry….that excuse…is just that…an excuse! She is cowardly at best and both lazy and cowardly at worst. She is not going to win any beauty contests for character believe us.
This is really no different that someone on the Stockton City Council bailing and running for Assembly after voting for the Bankruptcy. You just can’t do it. No one can and get away with it. She could be running against the old City Manager of Vernon and still lose. OK, Cudahy then! Politicians need to pick their battles and stand up with ethical elan.
You cannot run for both a municipal position and a state legislative position on the same ballot. Rather than being an excuse, this just reflects that she understands the law.
What has she done that is the equivalent of voting for bankruptcy? She has handled City Council business very well. But, she was unable to pass or stop critical motions while in the minority when the majority were three traditional Republicans; now she will be unable to pass or stop critical motions while in the minority when the majority are three insurgent libertarian Republicans. In the Assembly, by contrast, she’ll be in the majority — and unlike Norby she won’t be held in contempt by her colleagues as a grandstander.
I continue to think that your real problem with her is that she is the only Democrat around who could (and probably will) beat Norby in this election. I admire your loyalty to friends; it’s a pity that it happens to be loyalty to Norby.
jpmassar has published an update with a statement from Kamala Harris, which I’ve inserted into the end of the diary text.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/06/30/1104812/-Kamala-Harris-Speaks-Out-Support-rights-of-California-homeowners
*Democrat? Independent? Peace & Freedom Party? Libertarian? American Independent? Natural Law? or Republican? Bad choices are are bad choices
regardless of party.
Check with the Registrar of Voters…..SQS can run for 14 different offices……as long as she pays for her Candidate Statement.
You can run for Water Board, School District and City Council……with no problem.
So, you are saying that suddenly….when you run for State Office….you can’t run
for anything else? Bring the law …link Dr. D. Show us the reg…..and then we will
belive you. Just saying ….don’t cut it either.
I’ll see if I can find it. My memory of the provision is that you can run for only one office in any election, with the exception of also being able to run for one’s party’s County Committee. I expect that it’s probably in Division 8 of the Elections Code, but a general provision like that could be in all sorts of places.
*Dr. D., We have run for multiple offices in the passed ourselves. So unless they have changed election law…..we stand unconvinced.
*Dr. D., – As we recall….had we won both or multiple races for example: City Council and School Board. We would have been faced with choosing which one we would take.