.
Years from now, future residents of Orange County may spit at the memory of those like you and me — alive today, exposed to the facts regarding global warning, but (from what they’ll be able to tell) doing nothing to stop it.
This prospect seems to have put Huntington Beach Councilmember Joe Shaw — surely the funniest Councilmember in any Orange County city — in an uncharacteristically glum mood this morning.
The problem seems to be a recent article in the LA Times suggesting a one-foot rise in sea levels by 2050 — and a five-foot rise by the end of the century.
“Tide gauges show that the world’s oceans have risen about 7 inches in the last century, and that rate is accelerating, the report notes,” the Times notes, referring to a joint study commissioned by Washington, Oregon, and California and the Feds that noted that California is going to have the worst of it, because in addition to the effects of global warming it’s … well, already sinking.
Coastal California could see serious damage from storms within a few decades, especially in low-lying areas of Southern California and the Bay Area. San Francisco International Airport, for instance, could flood if the sea rises a little more than a foot, a mark expected to be reached in the next few decades. Erosion could cause coastal cliffs to retreat more than 100 feet by 2100, according to the report.
For an idea of what’s in store, the report says, look at what happened in the winter of 1983. That’s when a series of potent El Niño-driven storms hit California’s coast, causing more than $200 million in damage from flooding, high waves and erosion. More than 3,000 homes and businesses were damaged and 33 oceanfront homes destroyed.
And that’s the most imminent problem. Notwithstanding my artist’s rendering of a future Huntington Bay permanently replacing most of Surf City USA, the main danger in the medium term is the coastal areas being hammered by increasingly worse storms. This not only has a direct physical impact, but a financial one: it could become impossible to get insurance for homes and businesses in the area, already made difficult by the flood plain.
(Yes, libertarian Huntington Beach: libertarians outside of your city think that you should either not live there or absorb the risk of disaster yourselves. No government protection for the likes of you! Ironic, isn’t it?)
Newport Beach, next door, is described in an LA Times story from last March as being in the forefront of preparation for rising sea levels.
“The state of preparedness was close to zero in terms of looking forward to climate change and what it’s going to bring,” said Susanne Moser, a social science researcher at the Woods Institute for the Environment at Stanford University, who has surveyed coastal cities and counties about planning for rising sea levels. “Since then there’s been an explosion of interest on the local level.”
In Newport Beach, the attitude change came in response to concerns about the future of its harbor, an expansive waterfront dotted with islands and sheltered from the open ocean by the densely populated Balboa Peninsula. Tens of thousands of people live in the area, much of it just a few feet above sea level.
After a sea level rise of just over a foot, a 2008 city-commissioned study said, an extreme high tide would result in widespread flooding on Balboa Peninsula and “near-complete flooding of Balboa Island.”
With that in mind, Newport Beach officials are focusing on low-lying Balboa Island, a tightly packed neighborhood of homes and beach cottages where locals zoom through the streets on golf carts and navigate the harbor in electric boats. A narrow sand spit that was dredged into an island a century ago, Balboa Island now houses nearly 2,000 homes, which are considered to be at the greatest risk of flooding in the city.
“Just a foot” — not so mild-seeming now, is it? It’s admirable that Shaw is trying to move Huntington Beach in the direction of preparedness — and we hope that his fellow Council Members take the hint from their Beach neighbor that it’s time to make plans. It may be a struggle; back in the initial days of the movement to preserve Bolsa Chica, when my father was involved in city politics, I recall him telling a story of a Councilman’s reaction to concerns over preparation for a “100-year flood” in the basin. His comment, honest-to-God (if memory serves), is that Huntington Beach didn’t have to worry about a 100-year flood, because it hadn’t had one of those in over 100 years.
Orange Juice Blog wants to help, of course: one possibility to consider is for the two Beach cities to join forces — and invade and conquer Costa Mesa to take advantage of that city’s high ground. (Surely there are enough defense contractors around to figure out how to make it work!)
(Thanks to a Facebook friend who provided links to the above LAT stories, whose privacy I’ll respect unless permitted to do otherwise.)
Yes, let’s take GOAT HILL!
Riggy is MINE.
Joe Shaw would be just stoking a fears of rising sea levels to crank up the perceived value of his condominium on top of the Bolsa Chica mesa. Everyone on the high ground is at least 40 feet above the water!
That is indeed one completely absurd way of viewing Shaw’s motivation here.
Alternatively, one could suppose that he is taking his job seriously as a Councilman of a city that sells its beach tourism of which a large portion is quite flat and extremely low.
P.S.: You forgot to blame the scientific community, which is apparently in league with Shaw to raise his condo’s value.
Joe Shaw lives in a condominium on the Bolsa Chica mesa? It makes sense now. Joe Shaw opposes building any new residences on the Bolsa Chica mesa in part because the increased supply may threaten the value of his home.
Wow, that explains it for sure!
It explains why Joe has fought for the HB environment for the entire decade or so since he’s been around here … because he knew that, even though he was in Southeast HB, one day he would own a condo on the BC Mesa and that would help his home value.
Except, he doesn’t live on the Mesa, or have a condo there.
In fact, he currently lives near the Fountain Valley border, about as far off as you can get.
Dip shit.
For this, we have to all sing a verse of the JOE SHAW SONG. To the tune of Joe’s favorite Broadway tune, “Tonight” from West Side Story:
Joe Shaw, Joe Shaw, a Councilman for all,
Environmental hero so true –
Small businessman, so steadfast in his plan
To make Council responsive to you!
We SAW him fighting off Poseidon,
defending Bolsa Chica,
and then we stood in awe!
So Vote Joe Shaw,
A bold Surf City Council hurrah … FOR SHAW!!!!!!!
Newport is way out front on the sea level rise situation. They are also well aware of what the effects of a tsunami would be on their little slice of heaven.
Fletcher Jones Motorcars could expand into a yacht brokerage with all of the broken yachts that they would have in their parking lot.
Check out the tsunami inundation map:
http://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/geologic_hazards/Tsunami/Inundation_Maps/Orange/Pages/Orange.aspx.
As for ganging up on Costa Mesa…..Seal Beach might want to join in, and they’re well armed!
Right now Costa Mesa’s government is operating with a skeleton crew, making them easy pickings. Aargh mateys!
Newport needs to give Mimi Walters the boot then. Wake up now, Newporters! Mimi is dirty on a lot of things, especially the environment.
And Dana R??? Shee-it. The Congressional DEAN of climate change deniers.
*We are busy building Seawalls as we speak. Berms? Hell no…we won’t go!
We can just keep shipping the sand from Mozambic…..heck, they don’t need it.
just build some big desal plants and solve the water shortage that is coming with global warming and help reduce sea levels. brilliant.
Hey yeah! Wait, how big and how many desal plants would we need to get the level of the Pacific Ocean down a foot?
And wait, how do those plants stop the tsunamis?
Brilliant!
Did anybody else notice how those maps stopped short of San Onofre?
That doesn’t seem sinister to me; San Onofre is in northwesternmost San Diego County, not Orange, and this was a map of Orange.
Anyway — you got some sorta problem with three-eyed fish?
You are correct sir!
Here’s the map:
sanonofresafety.org/tsunami-risk/.
If you’re guessing that SONGS is under water during a tsunami you would be correct twice.
Now why would San Diego put a nuclear generating station as far away from their population center as possible?
This seems more to be more of a threat in my lifetime than the incremental creep of the ocean over the top of Balboa Island.
I’m not very fond of three-eyed fish, but I really don’t care for odd numbers of nipples.
At least San Onofre only has two.
Luckily, God would not allow a tsunami to hit the OC coast — and if it did happen it would because of gay marriage.
(See, I’ve been studying my Republican Science talking points!)
I think the gay tsunami is on a different map.
Did Vern ever get exorcised ? He might be contagious.
The gay tsunami … the Vern exorcism … I’m starting to see how your mind works. I like it!
No, he hasn’t! Vern, we need to schedule your exorcism!
*Just ask the folks in San Clemente where San Onofre Nuclear Power Plant is. They will be more than happy to point it out on any map you come up with. When is the NRC going to demand that San Onofre offer the radiation readings of the air, water and ambient locations outside the domes – as they do in Japan?