.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb05e/eb05e782c1fd6985b4e4439a8139eac605d26770" alt="cw militarized police"
Militarized police, Anaheim July 2012. Photo by Cynthia Ward.
There are times when perception usurps reality, and nowhere is that more true than in law enforcement. It’s the perception of danger that prompts an officer to take the life of an unarmed suspect, and it is ONLY the perception of danger that the officer is held accountable for in the typical District Attorney investigation of an officer-involved shooting.
I truly believe the vast majority of law enforcement professionals are decent men and women who show up for work day after day wanting to do a good job. Unlike Robo-Call Pringle, I wouldn’t be so brazen as to presume to speak for the majority of Anaheim residents. I can only say that most people I personally speak with seem to appreciate the very difficult position the Police find themselves in. The general sentiment (as I see it) is that the public wants to work alongside the Anaheim Police Department to reduce the crime affecting all of us, and we want a true partnership in which we understand and trust one another. But that partnership only with two-way communication, and that communication is something we lack right now.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/345f6/345f6790e91f50ae834274d643b98b73a9e6f80d" alt="theresa and caesar"
Theresa Smith, still looking for answers about her son Caesar Cruz’ 2009 shooting by Anaheim police.
It sends a mixed message to claim that officers do not want to shoot young men on the street, and then claim that the system we have in place works just fine. If the system worked fine, why are there twice as many shooting victims at the hands of Police over the last two years than officers killed in the line of duty in the entire history of the Police department? Plainly, something is NOT working. The current system of self-examination for law enforcement is clearly unable to address whatever unique set of circumstances make Anaheim officers so much more fearful on duty than their counterparts in nearby cities. We need to get to the bottom of that fear and distrust before anyone else gets hurt. This must stop. To claim the system works is to say the death rate is acceptable, and it is not.
Nowhere else in government do we allow a department to review themselves – in fact that idea would be ludicrous in any other setting. In his State of the City address, Mayor Tom Tait pointed out that auditing our financial books is not a condemnation of the book-keeper, it is simply a common mechanism which assures the public that fiscal policies are followed and a standard of responsibility is met. Those audits also reassure the book-keeper that he or she is not subject to false accusations or changing standards. Accountability simply puts everyone on the same page. Why would we not extend that credibility and assurance to our law enforcement professionals?
Kerry Condon, the president of the Anaheim Police Association (the most powerful public employee’s union in the City) is spending vast amounts of time, energy, and union money sending a forceful message to the public. But he would do well to stick with facts.
I hope Condon does a better job when he helps the District Attorney assemble credible evidence for court, because his scare story that Oversight makes communities less safe is not backed up with specific examples from other cities where it’s been tried. Instead he loads messages with empty rhetoric, angry political attacks, and blatant lies that are easily checked and debunked. His emotionally charged buzzwords are designed to elicit kneejerk reactions. He doesn’t want you to think, only to feel.
Citizens who question the complete lack of transparency in the system of review are labeled “gang lovers” and caricatured as tattooed thugs chanting “F%#K the Po-lice!” into a bullhorn. Meanwhile at the other extreme, calls to “Support our police!” become twisted into “Never question law enforcement at any time for any reason no matter what.”
Somewhere in the middle of those black-or-white all-or-nothing attitudes are 350,000 Anaheim residents wondering what the Hell has happened to our city?
Union leader Kerry Condon would have us believe that the conflict stems only from two shootings last July, but this has been building for much longer – there have been nearly a dozen lost souls in the last few years! That Condon fails to see how much damage has been wrought is frankly alarming. Like a teenager angry at his parents for wanting to check his room, the more Condon struggles, the more Mom becomes convinced there may be good reason to check under her son’s bed and in the closet. What is it Kerry Condon is so afraid of?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ed94/5ed94d52aeed3a47ce086431d4783bc18147c4db" alt="cw equestrian"
Equestrian units as seen from the author’s porch. Police from all over Southern California used a nearby park as staging grounds in preparation for more uprisings, which largely failed to materialize.
Either Kerry Condon shares the confidence that Mayor Tait and many others like myself have in our fine officers, and together we will find new policies to reduce the tension, fear, and shootings that are taking place in Anaheim, or he doesn’t. I suspect one problem may a mistrust of the public pool of candidates with which to fill the Oversight Committee appointments. Mr. Condon often speaks as though the Committee will be filled with enemy forces intent on the destruction of the Police department. Sadly, the increasing militarization of law enforcement too often means the public is no longer seen as partners in the fight against crime, and instead perceived as hostile opponents to be conquered, subdued, and kept in place. Is that what’s driving the division of our hometown?
Some argue that the Police are able to police themselves, but it was under Kerry Condon’s supervision that the office manager for the Police union – the only employee Condon was tasked with managing – was charged with embezzling $360,000 from them, in a period from August 2007 to March 2012. The (alleged) theft went unnoticed despite the reported use of such unsophisticated tools as a typewriter erase function to change the staffer’s paycheck amounts, something easily detected with one review of a bank statement. Condon never realized there was a problem until the IRS notified the union that their manager had failed to file taxes.
As a leader on full release, Kerry Condon still pulls in the pay, benefits, and seniority of his Police position, but is not subject to duty assignment, and union dues repay the City for his compensation while he offers his full attention to his union duties. When Kerry Condon cannot manage the oversight of his one and only employee, when running the union is his one and only occupation, I question his ability to determine how much oversight is adequate for hundreds of officers in positions far more stressful and potentially incendiary than that desk environment of his manager.
Condon’s most recent exploits include inflammatory and deceitful email blasts, facebook page posts, and robocalls, all designed to incite class warfare and hatred for Mayor Tait (the most prominent advocate for civilian oversight) as his political enemy. One recent blast went so far as to photoshop a picture of Tait’s face onto a piggy bank, while claiming “Mayor Tait tried to bully his City Council colleagues into a 50 percent increase for his part-time personal & political aide, who contributes only one percent into her own pension.”
But anyone who watched the Council meeting in question could clearly see WHO was being bullied, and it sure wasn’t the other 4 Council members. The Mayor was not trying to increase his budget, he was only trying to restore it, after his office staff was the only budget cut requested by Council in a $1.4 billion plan following a generous union giveaway to other City employees in the same budget. The cut left Tait without the ability to pay his 30-hour-a-week Policy Aide Mishal Montgomery, who carries a Master’s degree in her field, and is neither personal nor political in her assistance to the Mayor of the 10th largest City in California.
Condon is lying about Tait’s actions, and when he focuses on Montgomery’s pension costs, while dishonestly claiming Tait has somehow harmed Police pensions, he is being malicious and hypocritical. Anaheim’s Police officers pay NONE of the employee contribution for their own pensions – we CITIZENS pay the employee share as well as the employer cost of 30.623%. Mr. Condon and his friends cost the City roughly 40% of their pay in pension costs, (above their take-home pay) and they are the ONLY department to enjoy that arrangement. Condon is the last person on earth with the right to begrudge others their pay, and he accelerates the distrust by fudging about it.
For reasons I have never understood, the thin blue line wraps itself most protectively around those whose bad behavior tarnishes the public’s perception of the police force. When we cannot trust the spokesperson of the department to be truthful, is it any wonder we struggle to trust those who elect Condon to his position as the public face of the union?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/243da/243daafb69fb2374107583428b5dcf64b6ae6ccd" alt="cw yesenia welts"
Yesenia Rojas shows welts from where she was pelted with “non-lethal shots” from Police on Anna Drive last July.
Recognizing the danger in allowing mistrust to define the Police force, last summer Deputy Chief Raul Quezeda said, “If our community doesn’t trust us enough to tell us what’s going on, we won’t be successful.”
The very brave men and women of the Anaheim Police Department need to dump their union rep for a new leader, and work together with the Mayor and the public to create a system which reassures all residents that the process is as transparent and accountable as legally possible, that facts are reviewed by trusted neighbors and not just a wealthy and distant District Attorney with a reputation for protecting friends. One would think the majority of the force would welcome any change in the process that helps them feel safer on the streets, because the system we have is not doing the job.
Should they choose to take this path I know many Anaheim residents who will gladly stand shoulder to shoulder in support of those officers who want a clean house. Until then, we continue to hold our breath, fearful of the next explosion we pray does not come, knowing the system is set up to create the blast, and knowing there are some who even welcome it, because they can put the pyrotechnic display to their own use. May God help us.
Police may have good intentions when they join, but the system is thoroughly corrupt with racism (LAPD is infamous for their KKK affiliations) and a frightening penchant to thoroughly disregard people’s rights or safety. (Chris Dorner’s manifesto exposes the pressure to be racist. ) The blue line shall never be broken, so only communities can overseer these dangerous, over armed and under trained personnel.
Sharon, I see many areas in life where folks begin with the best of intentions and eventually become corrupted by the environment they once set out to change. Political office comes to mind the most quickly. Good people go to Sacramento and come back willing to trade their own mothers to get a bill passed. It is human nature to want to fit in, and if the culture one wishes to fit into condones the taking of another life, then that view becomes normalized. Perhaps that has already happened at APD, explaining why the department is fighting so hard to leave things the way they are, as though blowing away a kid on the street every now and then is the normal course of doing business, and we see no need to change that in any way. I hope I am wrong about that.
In Anaheim I do not believe the issues are driven by racism, believe me when I say the arrogance and abuse of power seen in a small minority of the force is driven more by arrogance against anyone daring to question them, regardless of skin color or language spoken. More on that later, I promise.
For now it is simply imperative to bring both sides together to work on the areas we do seem to agree with.
A) What we are doing results in dead young men lying on the sidewalk, affecting the victims, the families they leave behind, and even the cops who pull the trigger and their families.
B) Fear is a huge issue in Anaheim today. It is fear that makes a young Mexican male run from an officer, and it is fear that makes the officer draw his gun in a crowded residential neighborhood. We need to deal with the fear before anything else can be resolved.
C) We need to root out those selfish bastards who are using these issues for their own political or monetary agendas, and make that stop this second! The death of a young man is not an appropriate pawn in their game of chess (or Sim City) and anyone playing that game needs to be removed from leadership immediately. Those already removed from leadership (or never elected to office and simply collecting a paycheck from a corporate giant claiming a stake in the City) sticking their arrogant noses into the inner workings of the City need to crawl back under the rock they slithered out from.
The conflict on our streets has the whole world watching us on the news, it has all of us on pins and needles, and the only thing more evil than maintaining the status quo is perverting the conflict for profit, which some seem to be doing. As citizens me need to call bullshit on each and every individual or organization who lies to us, or manipulates us, and we need to do it vocally, forcefully, and repeatedly, It is up to us to send the message that this behavior is unacceptable. Nobody else is going to do it for us.
Sharon, if you believe anything that loser Chris Dorner had to say, please contact me because I have a bridge for sale in Brooklyn. Without question there are Officers in any Police Department who are biased about one thing or the other. It is human nature and if you suggest that you don’t have a few biases you are kidding yourself. The only difference is that when those Cops go to work they are required to check those personal biases at the door. Los Angeles Police Department went through some rough years in minority relations, but was never accused of affiliation with the KKK. For many years under court order, LAPD was forced to hire out of four pools of applicants. That means that they didn’t hire the best applicants, they hired in many cases lesser qualified minority applicants. My son works for LAPD in 77th Division and never once have I heard him speak disparingly about the people there. He likes his job, the professionals he works with and the community he serves. All this crap about the “Blue Line” might have been valid 40 years ago, but today’s Officer has it drummed into his/her head that if they see misconduct and fail to report it they are as guilty as the Officer doing it. For those Officers who fall by the wayside, it is not the corrupt Police System that changes them, it is the corrupt society in which they work. They are out there seven days a week in the gutters cleaning up the crap, so people like yourself don’t have to step in it. No excuse for their bad conduct, because from day one when pinning on the badge, you know fully what you are getting into and that you will be held to a higher standard of conduct than other citizens. You need to become better informed Sharon. Do a few ride alongs with the Officers wherever you live, get to know them and who knows the light may just come on in your head?
Pat, please start using paragraph breaks. It’s really painful to read without them. Thank you.
Roger that.
I can’t speak for Mayor Tom Tait’s motives, but I can tell you right now the City of Anaheim is not at all serious about establishing a civilian review board–at least something with teeth in it–to oversee the Anaheim Police Department.
Anybody who carefully reviewed the staff report about this matter that was introduced by City Manager Bob Wingenroth at the Tuesday, January 15th meeting of the Anaheim City Council would notice not only did it contain the rough outline of a model of a civilian review board that would be toothless and ineffective, but that it would be entirely rigged in favor of the Anaheim Police.
For example, the undeniable fact that Wingenroth suggested OC Human Relations–an entity which is in bed with the Anaheim Police and received $22,251 in funds from them for “services rendered” between November 2011 and September 2012–be part of any proposed civilian review board shows what a sick joke this whole thing really is.
See the following link for more details:
http://anaheiminvestigator.wordpress.com/2013/03/18/keeping-the-rabble-in-line-oc-human-relations-received-special-5000-payment-from-anaheim-police-chief-as-reward-for-pacifying-angry-anna-drive-residents/
All the rhetoric and fluff we hear coming from Kerry Condon and others is just that–rhetoric and fluff. It is political kabuki theater orchestrated for the purposes of isolating Mayor Tait politically and laying the ideological groundwork for a candidate of their choosing to run against him in 2014.
If the officer fears for his life every time he see a gang member, Its time he or she choose a new occupation.
Brian, I would agree with you to some extent. Considering the number of gang bangers and other hard core criminals out there today, Cops have to deal with these guys on a daily basis. Police work is not a career for the timid, faint of heart, or men and women who are afraid of their shadow. Bangers and criminals live by a certain code and it usually one of violence. Today’s Police Officer must assert themself to the point where they are in control of situations dealing with these people, but not be excessive in the process. Those guys have the same rights as any other citizen and it is often a fine line that the Officer must walk in dealing with them. That’s what we train and retrain the Officers to do and most of them perform in an exemplary manner in keeping this element of society in check. You can be thankful for that.
Without Fear though, Love would be meaningless.
Umm….. ummmm….
NAH.
I hope that Deputy Chief, Raul Quezada, the likely successor to retiring Chief Welters, will proactively steer the APD towards the stated vision of being a leader in Problem Oriented Policing: “We develop long‐term solutions to problems through innovative ideas, proven strategies and community partnerships.”
Innovative ideas and solutions are worthwhile to pursue. The police’s Union President is not helping to rebuild the trust with our diverse community. Ideological and non-pragmatic opposition to police accountability and citizen review does not help either. See the comment in the cross –reference APD article in this blog, by what seems to be a retired Irvine police officer.
Many cities have civilian review commissions, and Anaheim badly need one.
http://www.theiacp.org/PoliceServices/ExecutiveServices/ProfessionalAssistance/Ethics/ReportsResources/PoliceAccountabilityandCitizenReview/tabid/193/Default.aspx
!!!!!!!!!!!!uummmmm RACISMO…OC HUMAN RELATION USING MY NAME FOR WHAT ?WORKING N ANNA DR STOP .MENTIROSOS ALL YOU NEED ITS TO STOP GETTING MONEY OUT OFF THIS..BYE BYE BYE WALTER…YA ES AHORA