.
.
.

Fritchle, a licensed social worker, did not lie about his résumé. Chang, according to her primary opponent who did lots of research on her, lied A WHOLE LOT about hers. Do we voters care? Should we check? What do you think, readers? Anyone feel like taking on this story — maybe someone who voted for Philip Chen and feels they got jobbed?
With everything else going on these day, I have not had time to focus on my own home Assembly race, AD-55, where Republican Ling-Ling Chang is favored over Democrat Gregg Fritchle. Part of that, I believe, is due to widespread voter unawareness of Chang’s alleged — repeatedly alleged — tendency to lie about her résumé.
I know Fritchle pretty well; aside from the same(ish) first name, we were born the same year and look similar in some ways, except that if we’re two peas in a pod his pod was taller and protected him from premature balding and graying. I know him to be a good speaker, though a little on the garrulous side, and exceptionally smart and principled man. But there’s one big difference between us.
Fritchle is SO honorable that he doesn’t believe in negative campaigning — at all. He knows that Chang’s primary opponent Philip Chen was all over her for making up facts about herself and her accomplishments. But he doesn’t want to go down that path. He doesn’t want me to go down that path either, because he is high-minded about politics. I, by contrast, would avoid lying about anyone, or even the sort of implying fake things about them that some moral wizards distinguish from outright lying — but I think that people DO deserve to hear the truth.
Chang is the Republican nominee for this seat for two reasons: (1) she’s a servant of Redevelopment Sucking Machine former State Senate Minority Leader Bob Huff — like her, from Diamond Bar — and (2) she fits into the “attractive female Asian American candidate for Orange County office” template that Republicans nationwide are literally trying to use to prove that they’re not a racist party. (“Look at us! Ling-Ling Chang! Young Kim! Michelle Steel! Janet Nguyen! Lisa Bartl — wait, NOT Lisa Bartlett! Yes, she fits the template, but we’re supporting Robert Ming.”) We should not conclude that this is an act of jaw-dropping cynicism merely because it is.
We’re going to try to make some time to go over the “Ling-Ling Lies” file we’ve been collecting between now and the start of early voting — but, as you can tell, we’ve been pretty busy right now. So you, our readers, are welcome to help out! If you got material from Philip Chen slamming Ling-Ling Chang and chronicling her lies, please scan them and send them to “mail2greg4-OJB at yahoo dot com”. (If you can’t figure out how to make that into a real email address, don’t bother writing.)
BUT! If you’re simply interested in helping an honest, smart, decent, non-résumé-lying-about candidate collect the funds that he needs to get out HIS message, then you can help him out without being exposed to such (completely honest and legitimate) negativity. Here’s your invite:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/how-taxpayers-fleeced-well-heeled-investors–for-once-154833010.html
Familiar pattern (unfamiliar results)?
Ling -Ling sounds like a porn star.
no, that is a panda
I think you meant “pot sticker.”
To you, “Gail Eastman” sounds like a porn star.
she’s not?
[speechless]
Here’s the City of Anaheim’s press release on the outcome of CATER’s case against the City of Anaheim on the first attempt at Convention Center Bond Expansion indentures. We’ll have lots of coverage on this starting Sunday night or Monday morning; for now, just bear in mind that CATER always expected this to go to the appellate courts — where new legal precedents are actually made — and that the Convention Center bonds remain on hold until after that appeal (and a Supreme Court case following upon it, if necessary) are complete.
But let’s give them their chance to speak for now — before we get to explain the decision later.
So many ripe targets in that statement! There goes my weekend!
in the interest of fairness, does your lawsuit contain a private attorney general claim and, if so, when you win, are you taking all your friends and supporters on a cruise to aruba
to me gail eastman sounds like a jr high vice principle
Read this from the Weekly:
http://blogs.ocweekly.com/navelgazing/2014/09/informants_ocda.php
I’m not the only one who predicted that this was coming — and would come only when the election was safely out of the way. But it still does makes me proud to have put up at least some opposition to the man whose stupid mismanagement just let a murderer go free.
From the Voice’s coverage of the Costa Mesa Council “Feet to the Fire” forum.
“We can triple the police force tomorrow and crime’s not going to change much,” said Righeimer.”
Really now? Must be nice to think that one is completely unaccountable for one’s mistakes!
I have NEVER even heard of Greg Frisch, Meanwhile Chang is ALL OVER N.Orange County. Three events last Satuday. Mail and the RELENTLESSphone calls.
She has the machine behind her. He seems to have nothing.
His last name is “Fritchle,” commenter pretending to be Dan Hughes.
Yeah, she has a great deal more money than he does. On the other hand, it takes more money to get people to buy a defective and dangerous product.