.
.
.
There was a popular saying after the attacks of Sept 11, 2001, and that saying was “Oceans no longer protect us.”
Well, similarly, on a local (and less horrific) level, we see that city limits no longer protect us from the onslaught and “negative externalities” of the voracious High Density Developers of neighboring OC towns. Huntington Beach citizens of the right left and center, while having been admirably engaged in their own town’s issues this past year, especially against our own HDD, have been blissfully unaware of the “urban village” the oil-company owners of the Banning Ranch property want to impose RIGHT ON OUR SOUTHEAST BORDER, blest and greenlit by Newport’s developer-funded Council, but which will IMPACT THE HELL out of us AND Costa Mesa.
What you see to the left is a 401-acre area known as Banning Ranch, stretching from the Santa Ana River (HB border) to developed parts of Costa Mesa and Newport, and from Talbert Park at the north to PCH. It lies partly in the jurisdiction of development-crazed Newport Beach, and partly in unincorporated OC.
The area’s been used for pumping oil since it was found there in the 40’s, although it is still a beautiful open space and home to many rare and sensitive plant and animal species. It now belongs mostly to Shell and Exxon-Mobil, through their front group Aera Energy, which along with a couple of smaller entities, now constitutes Newport Banning Ranch LLC (NBR). And since drilling this area has become less profitable, NBR is planning a High-Density Development that is denser than the last five coastal developments combined (Marblehead, Dana Point, Crystal Cove, Castaways, Bolsa Chica.) This would include:
- 1,375 new homes;

Idyllic NBR sketch of a FRACTION of their proposed Urban Village.
- A “RESORT HOTEL COMPLEX” including
- the Hotel itself;
- a small “youth hostel“;
- ballrooms and meeting rooms;
- restaurants;
- commercial space (a couple of strip malls)
- the “urban village” – a mixed-use area of retail stores with housing on top, 65 feet high;
- undefined “resort housing” possibly meaning time shares?
- 17 acres of infrastructure i.e. roads, sidewalks, gutters;
- LIGHTED BALLFIELDS – how nice for the neighbors already there!
- Consolidate oil operations into 2 properties
- There is promised “OPEN SPACE” but two caveats there:
- That includes three spots they can’t even legally THINK of building: the Newland wetlands, the riparian arroyos, and the coastal bluffs, and they want to encroach on those as far as they can; and
- The other thing they’re calling “open space” is the LUNAR LANDSCAPE they will create with the herculean amounts of DIRT their project will displace (and to be fair, they’ll probably eventually cover over with man-made parklands, but this is not what most of us call open space.)
Okay. Newport Beach voters must want this kind of shit, or else they wouldn’t keep voting for development-besotted, bought-and-paid-for councilmen… (and then when there’s a supposed “shakeup” they pick nimrods like Scott Peotter who fight gay marriage valiantly but follow the old guard’s lead on development matters.) Why should Huntington Beach (or Costa Mesa) care? Well, how about…
1. TRAFFIC
The developers themselves conservatively estimate that their project will lead to 15,000 more “car trips” each day. Does that mean 15,000 cars going out each day? Because we all tend to take our cars out more than once each day. But either way, it is a mind-boggling addition to the already existing traffic in our three towns – from the daily bumper-to-bumper limbo on the 55 to the already-overwhelmed “tip of the funnel” in Costa Mesa at 19th and Newport.
Studies further confirm that at least THREE MAJOR SOUTHEAST HB INTERSECTIONS will be reduced to GRIDLOCK (technically termed LOS-E or LOS-F) – that’s Brookhurst/Hamilton, Brookhurst/PCH, and Magnolia/PCH.
The Zombie Return of the Banning Bridge (or 19th-Street Bridge, across the river into HB?) Why of course. We thought we killed it dead a few years ago, with hundreds of citizens turning up with pitchforks and terrifying the politicians who loved it (and chasing some out of office) but this Banning Ranch development will be used to make the case that we need it after all. I am not kidding – more than one Newport Councilperson has been recently overheard drooling over that prospect.

Poseidon; photo credit Charles Lam of the Weekly
And speaking of building a piece of shit none of us want and using that to make the case that another piece of shit we don’t want is NECESSARY: This many thousands of new residents are going to need water, and the more people getting stuffed up into here needing water the more our overlords are gonna tell us we need POSEIDON.
Friends, have you noticed yet? The same exact politicians back both unlimited development and Poseidon – Poseidon that will hike our water bills significantly and unnecessarily, pollute our ocean, and make billions for investors from Boston. Again, not making this up – Newport is one of the VERY FEW towns to have signed a “letter of intent” to buy Poseidon’s expensive desalinated water.
3. The Dust Has Eyes.
Sixty-some years of pumping oil in one 400-acre lot leads to a heck of a lot of toxic dirt, I tell you what – and the remediation and construction that will occur if this project goes through will send clouds of hazardous dust ALL OVER the area – think of the Santa Ana winds especially! Costa Mesa will be hardest hit, but so will the neighborhoods and families of Southeast Huntington Beach.
I hope I have got your attention. I should have written this weeks ago. Zero hour is Wednesday’s Coastal Commission Hearing in Long Beach. The CCC’s staff has already recommended against this monstrosity, but the Commission itself – not always as straightforward and honest as one might like – doesn’t always follow staff’s recommendation. So they need to hear from us – enviros and HDD warriors, Huntington Beach, Costa Mesa and Newport.
A lot of us are going to this Long Beach hearing on a specially chartered bus, and I’ll put the info for that below; but if you can’t at this late moment join us, at least take a moment to sign this petition to the Commission.
Oh. Look at that. The buses are now FULL. Sounds like you’re going to be part of a BIG popular movement. I copy the rest of this from the website of The Banning Ranch Conservancy (those are the good guys.)
The Coastal Commission hearing for Banning Ranch is Wednesday, October 7 at 9 am at the Long Beach Convention Center, Seaside Ballroom, 300 E. Ocean Blvd. in Long Beach 90802.
The buses are now full! Car pooling is being arranged. For more information, call Terry Welsh at (714) 719-2148.
If you’re driving, parking is available in the Terrace Theatre Garage across from the Seaside Ballroom for $10/day. The BRC will have a table on Seaside Way near the Ballroom. Look for the Banning Ranch Conservancy banner. Refreshments will be available. Bring a snack-pack or bag lunch and water. Restaurants are not in the immediate vicinity.
This hearing will determine the fate of Banning Ranch. The developers are just one step away from having their deplorable project approved. We can’t let that happen.
Join your Newport-Mesa and Huntington Beach neighbors who share grave concerns about the project’s impacts. This is your chance to say NO to more traffic jams and choke-point intersections; NO to air, noise and light pollution at unsafe standards; NO to siphoning off 200 million gallons of water a year from our scarce water reserves; NO to the excavation of 2.5 million cubic yards of contaminated soil that will create public health risks, as well as the destruction of the Ranch’s rare natural resources.
Let’s stand together and tell the Commissioners we want them to protect our precious coastal resources, as well as our neighborhoods!
If you can’t make the hearing, please sign the petition to the Coastal Commissioners.
Thank you for helping save Banning Ranch as an open space park for the public to treasure and enjoy!
Where is the petition? I say NO MORE BULDING! Clean up what is here!
There are two links to the petition in the story, Mary. One is right near the end, just above that last picture. They are underlined and bold. Thank you.
Excellent summary of the facts, and I’m very glad to hear somebody finally speaking about the portion of the land the developer cannot build on. The developer is saying they will save more than 200 acres, but they include the portion that is already protected. So they make it sound like some huge magnanimous gesture on their part, when they’re actually developing the majority of the bulldable land on the site.
Here also is a link to a video that summarizes the information the developer is hiding behind their “We’re all about open space” BS.
http://www.StopNewportTraffic.com
I didn’t want to make the piece too long, but wanna see the most ridiculous-ass greenwashing group/website ever? Check out the so-called Newport Banning Land Trust, funded and created by the developers and beloved by the local politicians: http://newportbanninglandtrust.org/
They had a big shindig a month or two ago and a bunch of Newport politicians were there. Really making out like they’re there to SAVE the place.
Yes, it is ironic. In Banning Ranch the “Conservancy” is the genuine conservationists and the “Land Trust” is the astroturf greenwashers, while in Bolsa Chica it’s the exact opposite – the “Land Trust” is genuine and the “Conservancy” is phony.
Reminds me of New York Times/Post, Washington Post/Times…
Coyote Hills is back on the agenda in Fullerton, so we can’t call this CH 2.0.
I guess you get the trilogy reference then. Return of the Jedi, Return of the King . . . Return of the . . . (I’m out. Got nuthin.)
Have fun with CEQA. Toll lanes anyone?
Thanks for getting this info out there, Vern! Show up at the Long Beach Convention Center tomorrow, everybody, to let the California Coastal Commission know the public wants to Save Banning Ranch!
Vern, thanks so much for writing this! We need as much light brought to this as possible!
I really do not see the problem. we build a couple of houses, maybe a hotel, some retail, my friends make a few bucks, some politicos get reelected and some lower income people on the wrong side of the Huntington Beach and Costa Mesa tracks add a few minutes to their commute to their dead end jobs, some other people, or maybe the same ones, get a little toxic dust in their lungs (something obamacare is supposed to handle) and some depreciating oil fields get renewed value.
how can any rational person be against this project
Suzanne Forster writes in from last night’s meeting:
COASTAL COMMISSION DELAYS BANNING RANCH PROJECT
The 12-member panel California Coastal Commission voted to delay any decision about the Banning Ranch project for ninety days. The Coastal Staff’s report on the project’s impacts presented a powerful case against any sort of approval of the project, even a heavily conditioned approval. Instead, the commissioners opted for delay.
The developers (NBR) agreed to meet with Coastal Commission staff and attempt to devise a development footprint that would reduce the grading plan and significantly reduce impacts on the site’s abundant Environmentally Sensitive Habitat Areas (ESHA). They must come to an agreement in sixty days in order for a hearing to be scheduled within 90 days. It’s hard to imagine this will be possible, given how far apart Coastal Staff and NBR are on what constitutes ESHA and what reasonably can be developed on the site.
At one point in the deliberations, Chair Kinsey essentially said that NBR had three choices, an opportunity to withdraw the project, a 90-day extension or a vote that would probably result in denial. NBR chose the extension, which will require them to work closely with staff to determine what kind of project would be suitable for a site as rich in rare natural resources and wildlife as Banning Ranch.
Given the obvious disdain NBR had for Staff’s map of a possible development footprint, this should be interesting.
The attendance at the hearing was Standing Room Only. The Seaside Ballroom was full to bursting, and the vast majority were in favor of saving Banning Ranch From any development at all. The sea of signs and waving hands was a sight to behold and very inspiriing. The outreach effort to residents of Newport Beach, Costa Mesa and Huntington took months of organization by Conservancy volunteers, but it was worth every second. Thank you all for your support. It means more than you could ever know!
Stay tuned….
*God we hate talking about oil, greedy developers, consultants and circling vultures all in one fell swoop. But here goes: What ever happened to the raparian growth, flat top oil drilling rigs and a design company with some many Engineering Order changes that they will have a five year program to pay off their kids college educations. What happened to the Super Fund toxic site that is supposed to wind up being a commercial/residential municipal center for West Newport. Maybe someone can even get a fresh bagel……..or croissant with chocolate….if they keep this nonsense up. Of course, we will not talk about the huge increase in traffic, pollution and local resident inconvenience. Heck, we are talking progress. Who wants to hold that back? Our opinion is simply….get the money from Standard Oil and call it a day.
any updates? what are realistic alternatives to those of us keep making babies? what are accessible inclusions? any disabled and seniors considered in plans? Any affordable? I just read Orange County has only built 10% of affordable need? Is this a mostly biz or residential proposal? Thanks for any info.
For a couple of other informed pieces on why Banning Ranch should be left wild, I have produced these as founder of the Nature Commission. Through the years, I’ve fought for leaving it as open space, contributing thousands of hours to the battle. Now working on a book about the area.
Links:
http://www.naturecommission.org/ar/banning-ranch-oil-profits-past-100-percent-habitat-future
http://www.naturecommission.org/scenes/banning-ranch-1
http://www.naturecommission.org/scenes/banning-ranch-vernal-pools