Anaheim had been waiting to hear how the tragic October 27 police killing of Abigail “Abby” Lopez could possibly be justified. All most of us saw was the 20-year old, on the bus bench outside of Burger King, apparently throwing down her BB gun in compliance with the police’s orders, and then, five seconds later, being shot to death. Were we missing something?
Then a couple weeks ago, the APD released its “critical incident report” video, which gives some answers but leaves some questions. At the distance they were at, the police thought Abby’s non-lethal BB gun was an actual “short-barreled assault rifle.” (In fact, from the distance they were at, they thought the diminutive short-haired girl was a man, as did the witness who made the 911 call.) They say that, when she was commanded to drop the gun, she dropped it and then retrieved it, “multiple times” – which we don’t see in their video.
They say that what she DID drop five seconds before being killed, in the short Instagram video below that we’ve all seen, was NOT the gun but something else. (The female cop, one of the ones who later fired, seemed sure that Abby had TWO guns, which became a rumor.)
And they say that right after dropping that object, Abby RAISED HER GUN at the officers and was shot, by two cops, with four bullets. In this video of the last few seconds of her life, the camera pans to the cops at the moment she allegedly raised her gun, so we don’t see that happen:
View this post on Instagram
But before we get to the APD’s “Critical Incident Report,” let’s ask:
BB Guns: Why do People Have Them?
I have to ask, and we have to know, if only because Abby is the FOURTH person killed in the last 12 years by Anaheim Police, just for having a BB gun that the cops thought was a real gun – and no other crime! The fourth that we KNOW of!
Owning a BB gun is generally legal in California, although you need parental permission if you’re under 18. It IS illegal under Penal Code 20170 to “DISPLAY an imitation firearm” in public – and that includes BB guns, which obviously resemble real guns to your average person, even to cops from a distance, cops who you’d think could tell the difference.
The BB’s themselves are plastic and not deadly, and BB guns are generally quieter and have less power than even other air-guns that are also used for backyard target-practice or “plinking.” A few years ago a kid in our neighborhood was having a blast with one, shooting at birds – everybody got upset, his parents took it away, and we never saw it again.
Abby’s BB gun
Back in early 2012, Bernie Villegas thought it’d be a great idea to buy his son a BB gun for his birthday, and Bernie first spent a little time in his apartment parking lot “plinking” at bottles, which led to a worried neighbor’s 911 call. Bad luck, a responding officer was Nick “Buckshot” Bennallack, who shot Bernie in the back as he walked home with the present. (Bennallack went on to fatally shoot three other men – the unarmed Manuel Diaz, the armed and Fry’s-robbing Steen Parker, and the unarmed Daniel Ramirez. Bennallack is no longer on the force.)
The other three BB gun tragedies we know of were all people with mental and/or drug problems – Peter Muntean AND Eliuth Penaloza Nava in 2018, and now Abby Lopez. Not doing anything wrong except for carrying a BB gun and acting erratic. So, it may seem obvious, but if you have a mentally troubled friend or family member, you should probably try to make sure they don’t go around with a BB gun.
Now let’s see what the APD has to say about all this. [CLICK BELOW!]
A burning question: If Abby didn’t drop her BB gun five seconds before her death as most of us thought we saw, then what WAS it that she dropped? The police describe her as “discarding an unknown item” but still “believed to be carrying a short-barreled assault rifle.” You’d think after approaching the fallen woman they would have determined what that “unknown item” was. Watching the Instagram video closely it looks like something “floppy,” and later footage shows a black sort of bag – maybe that was what she tossed, it seems relevant.
To the right on the sidewalk – is that the unknown object she discarded?
But the most important question is: Did she really raise the “gun” toward the officers, right before they fired? Only that would explain why two of them felt it necessary to kill her. But the Instagram video doesn’t show that, and neither do the 3 bodycams – they are either obscured by objects or too far away. And it would be helpful to see the location and position of the gun where she would have dropped it, but we are not shown that.
At the moment of being shot –
could this be her pointing her BB gun at the police?
Hard to tell.
A court will decide, possibly a jury, whether this APD killing of Abigail “Abby” Lopez was justified, whether she was reasonably considered to be such a threat to public safety that she had to be put down right away. As will the state’s Attorney General, under AB 1506, since she was technically unarmed.
One thing we do not appreciate in this Critical Incident Report is the inclusion of the list of Abby’s previous brushes with the law, as they’re irrelevant to whether this killing was justified. Manuel Diaz’ mother Genevieve Huizar established in her successful Excessive Force appeal against Bennallack that the inclusion of such information, unknown to the firing officer, is not admissible in court. The cops who shot Abby didn’t know who she was – they thought she was some man with a “rifle.” The only reason for defenses to include this information is to make juries, and the public, think “Oh well, no great loss.”
Meanwhile Anaheim mourns the loss of Abigail Lopez, a promising, big-hearted young lady who was going through a rough spell.
Belatedly fixed this old story, which had the wrong photo for Steen Thomas Parker…
https://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2020/06/anaheim-swat-officer-nick-bennallacks-fourth-killing-daniel-ramirez-2019/
Do you know if any video exists from surveillance cameras at that Burger King ?
Great question! It’s probably too late – if past is prologue, the police will have taken it by now “for evidence.”
Or, if not, probably recorded over.
Target practice and vermin hunting. That’s what BB guns are good for. And, shooting down your neighbors drone. lol!!
Too bad she wasn’t this guy and she wasn’t in Santa Ana.
https://abc7.com/amp/orange-county-santa-ana-man-with-gun-armed-suspect/13716888/
From what I can tell, no call of “drop the gun [now]” came before the fusillade of four shots that left her on the ground. All 4-5 of them came when she was already slumped down motionless onto the sidewalk. While it is possible that the cops believed that she had been and was still holding a gun, it seems far more likely that they had already seen her drop and were calling out orders after the fact just a way to cover their asses.
I would call this choice despicable, but it may be that they were instructed to do so in the event of a shooting to make it look like they had called out a timely warning that was ignored, thereby justifying the shooting (unless, as here, some witness had recorded it to allow us to establish the sequence of events.) If this sort of deception is part of training, then the city should be liable. If it’s just passed down as part of lore from other peer officers, then liability still exists but is harder to prove.
The female officer’s voice is distinctive in the audio track and it seems clear that she should have known that the target was already down at the time she started shouting. I hate to pick on her, but it sounds like she was echoing the initial shouts by one of the male cops. (Forensic analysis could presumably determine which one.) She should probably be the first one interviewed to find out why she shouted when (and only when) she did — and why she did so, for what purpose (given the victim’s being down), and based on what training.)
Um, no, they shouted a lot before the fusillade actually.
And then they shouted a lot afterwards too. It seems like they always do that afterwards, out of excess energy, or for the benefit of the shocked spectators. And there’s always the remote possibility that, as in a movie, the wounded suspect will rise up firing with renewed energy.
OK. That earlier screaming is not within the clip. Still, the screaming afterwards seems duplicitous.
Why haven’t they released the APD body cam footage yet?? Appears Sus!
Well they released SOME of it. I hope you and Greg had a chance to click on the “Critical Incident Report” – I should make clearer that it’s there.
(It’s that big black rectangle that says “This video is age-restricted…”)
Someone still needs to PRA ALL of the bodycam footage – we’ll probably end up doing it soon if the family’s lawyers haven’t.