UPDATE, 6:20 p.m. Monday January 15
Steve Rocco did not file. Mark Lopez isn’t marked as not having filed, but also isn’t marked as having filed, so either he was very very late or he’s very very out of the race. It looks like Lou Correa and (I think) Chuyen Nguyen will be the two Democrats in the race; Chris Phan and Andrew Do will be the Republicans; and I have no idea where Lupe Moreno affiliates these days. Progressives didn’t even try.
ORIGINAL POST
Filing closes tomorrow for the January 27, 2015, election that will replace new State Senator Janet Nguyen on the OC Board of Supervisors. Two hours later, the Democratic Party of Orange County will assemble to, in all likelihood, endorse former State Senator Lou Correa for the position; the Republican Party of Orange County is expected to do the same with Janet Nguyen’s once and then returned Chief of Staff Andrew Do. The third candidate in the race is Garden Grove City Councilman, Deputy DA, and former JAG officer Chris Phan, who was the first to announce his intention to run to replace Janet if she won the election. As my ability to write about the race may be compromised after the probable endorsement of Correa, I thought that it would be best to get in my interview with Phan now, which is in a companion post. But first, let’s get the lay of the land.
Aside from these three likely front-runners, the other candidates in the race are Mark Lopez (who ran against Miguel Pulido this year but dropped out of the race in favor of Roman Reyna); Chuyen Van Nguyen (one of the older generation of Vietnamese activists and apparent a friend of Phan’s former Garden Grove City Council colleague Dina Nguyen, part of the coalition that has backed Van Tran in the past); anti-immigrant Minuteman leader and Tea Partier Lupe Moreno; and perennial candidate Steve Rocco, who is not expected to be a factor in the race and will not be further discussed in any detail. Lopez, Moreno, and Rocco are probably running for their own reasons; Nguyen, who has never before run for elected office, is likely running to take votes from older Vietnamese away from Phan and/or Do. Only Phan braved Friday’s storm to complete his registration application; other candidates could still join the fray and none of the six candidates who haven’t finished registering for the race will necessarily do so. The likelihood is the at least Correa and Do will do so.
Correa is either a moderate or conservative Democrat, depending on the issue, who has tended to stay out of the main intraparty (and even some interparty) fights over the past few years. I don’t think that he endorsed, certainly not early, in the infamous 2012 primary pitting Tom Daly against Julio Perez and Michele Martinez, which split the party deeply. I’ve found no indication that he endorsed Bao Nguyen against old-school Dem (and Republican favorite) Bruce Broadwater in the recent election. He’s been rumored for over a year not to have been supportive (except perhaps on a perfunctory level, and I’m not even sure about that) of Jose Solorio’s challenge to Janet Nguyen for his own State Senate seat, speculation being that he wanted to run for her Supervisorial seat when the moved up. In the recent Anaheim City Council election, he gave some support to fellow Democrat Dr. Jose Moreno, who could not afford flyers, but gave substantial support to Republican “bad government” advocates Kris Murray and Gail Eastman, supporting their unquestioning allegiance to police and fire interests (who, along with prison guards have formed one leg of his major source of donors) on the same late-hit flyer where their colleague Jordan Brandman flat-out endorsed them over Dr. Moreno. All of this makes any claim that he might want to make on Democratic party loyalty a bit ironic.
Correa has support from the Orange County Labor Federation and the Orange County Employees Association, including from some real liberals, despite regularly shunning the non-public safety unions when it has suited him. (Former OCLF leader Tefere Gebre used to do a bit comparing Correa to Solorio that it would probably be better for me not to quote, which was along the lines of “at least he’s honest about where he stands” but much funnier.) On the issues, sometimes he votes with most Dems, although sometimes only after much more struggle than should have been necessary; other times, most notoriously on the bill to allow the Insurance Commissioner to vet and veto unreasonable jumps in health insurance premiums, he has played a major role in killing them. He was one of the Senators who led the charge against a state-based single payer health insurance system in early 2013, which is when I wrote the linked and justifiably unkind article about him that contained one of my favorites among my photo captions:
When the political body is infected by a foreign object, such as a plan to offer health insurance sufficient to cover the poor and middle class, the immune system sends out special blood cells, called LouCo-cytes, to defend against the invaders. An excess of these cells can lead to a dangerous condition known as “LouCorrhea.”
(Note: It’s actually “leukocytes” that can lead to “leukorrhea,” which I knew was a word for some kind of medical condition when I wrote that piece — but I didn’t know, or even imagine, its precise definition. Whoops! It may be that this much-harder-than-intended jibe is why the former Senator has never, ever, said a single word to me on all of the occasions, starting not long after this article, when we’ve been in the same room just a few feet away — something I find amusing. Every time I’m snubbed, I wonder why he just doesn’t call himself “Luis” if he’s going to use his middle name at all.)
Anyway, some of the county’s biggest advocates of single-payer health care are being asked to endorse Correa on Monday night — and most probably will.
Maybe it’s inevitable; Democrats are humiliated by the absence of of a Democrat on the County Board of Supervisors since Tom Umberg finished third behind Janet Nguyen and Trung Nguyen (who went to a recount) in the race to replace Correa when he left the Supes for the State Senate. Dems, and Labor, want a Democrat on the Board — some out of pride, some because they want to position a conservative Democrat to be the one to replace Loretta Sanchez when she finally runs for higher office (like Governor or Senator or Vice President.)
As for Andrew Do, I’m told that he can be volatile, but I can’t find the video. He’s endorsed by Pat Bates, Mimi Walters, and Ed Royce, which is pretty much all I need to know about him beyond his being Janet’s right hand man (most of the time.)
First, who’s going to be sucking the votes away from Correa? With the space for a candidate on the Left wide open in what ought to be a district where one could imagine cobbling together a liberal plurality, if Lopez is liberal, and campaigns a whole lot, he could take a bite out of Correa’s total. (Not nearly enough to win, though.) Lupe Moreno may get votes from some Latinos who don’t know anything about her other than her name — and won’t they be surprised if they learn about her, if so! And Rocco got 10% of the vote in his last race, suggesting that some people will vote for him out of sheer perversity if nothing else. But the biggest drag on Correa is not so much going to be his opponents as the sheer low propensity of Latinos to vote, which will be even more significant in a special election. Unions could in theory be a player here, but last month’s election suggest the limits of their reach. Yes, they can spend money, but Correa’s a known personality, and there are too many people to attack if they wanted to go negative, and too few needles in the haystack (that is, people who will end up voting) to target very effectively.
Phan and Do will be competing for many of the same voters in high-participation Garden Grove and Westminster, but there’s a real question as to whether Janet’s mysterious persuasive power can transfer to her Chief of Staff. Phan has to be happy to have a shot at riding on the wave of Bao’s coalition, even if Bao (given less slack than, say, Brandman) can’t endorse him. (Or maybe he can, if he wants to. Who’s going to stop him?) Chuyen is going to get a lot of older, culturally conservative voters, which may end up hurting Do more than Phan, who will do better with younger Viet voters. Do’s reach is probably also limited to the Vietnamese areas, while Phan — younger, hipper, cleaner, and both a Deputy District Attorney and a military veteran — is more likely to appeal to non-partisan voters and whites.
Of course, much of this could change when filing closes on Monday — so look for a follow-up. For now, Chris Phan’s interview is coming right up!
*Dr. D., Great insider look as usual. When they start giving out Web Awards for Political Blogs….it truly amazes us that you are not at least nominated every year. Thanks so much for a truly close look at who is running and maybe why. As you know, we fully support Lou, his team of political professionals and those that he draws around him and into his inner circle. We look forward to being put back on the inter-active e-mail list after he is elected to District 1. So, let’s take a further look into the possible OC Supes dynamic with Lou in District 1. Lou and Lisa should be fast partners and with Michelle that makes a majority possible on almost every issue. Michelle seems to be positioning herself to the be “Swing Vote”, much as Janet and Pat did simultaneously at times. Maybe that will be the case with Lisa and Michelle as well. This will be an interesting OC Supervisor group. Hopefully, they can correct the bloody OCTA, TCA and Homeless Issues……or at least make a valid attempt to do so. We shall see what we shall see. Hopefully, this group will not fall into the innane……as we seem to here in Newport Beach. “Wow.., let’s talk about Wood Burning Fire Rings and Cement Bunnies!” for example. The OC Supes need to keep their targets on Fire Prevention, Public Safety, Transportation, Vector Control, Water Quality, Homelessness as well as Veterans and Seniors for starters. Keeping their priorities in order will of course require those pesky Budget constraints. It will be very interesting to see how the New Assessors Office deals with things along with our pal Shari in the Treasurers Office making sure those Tax Bill get out on time and with plenty of proper
notification and ease of payment. We cannot believe that we shouldn’t be able to turn around the TCA and OCTA to start using cell phone apps to collect tolls. Who is getting the back door money to stop this from happening? Someone is….and they should be fired immediately! Again, thanks Dr. D. great work sir!
So true. And really, you all deserve awards! OJB is quickly becoming my favorite “blog away from home”.
A dose of moderate politics on the Board of Sup’s would be refreshing. Let’s just hope the usual cronyism and smoke filled room lobbyists don’t mess it up.
When has the Board not been moderate? It sits atop a great welfare pyramid.
Handing out largesse to campaign fundraising lobbyists is neither right nor left. It’s just graft.
So … Steve Rocco for you, then? He grabs, but he doesn’t smash!
What impulse caused Chris Phan to support Bao over Broadwater?
It sounds like a non-grabbing impulse. Maybe he needs to think it through, flesh it out, a little more.
You are right, the catsup bottle was intact. You’re catchin up with OC lore!
Vern, I was under the impression is was actually Ketchup. Are you sure about that?
Sure, they’re “moderate” compared to Dana Rohrabacher & Tim Donnelly. But come on, that’s an awfully low bar to clear!
You are mistaken. The supervisors almost never invent policy, they simply carry out programs created and overseen by the federal and state governments. They pretend to be interested in efficiency and demand “metrics” (not knowing a damn thing about analysis) and that’s about it. once or twice a year they have an opportunity to rail against “Obamacare” without knowing what it is. That’s it.
The incompetence, hidden disasters, real estate boondoggles, and lack of oversight could just as easily be presided over by Democrats. Or chimpanzees, for that matter.
Bitter dude, we have to get you back in the game somehow.
You won’t get any argument from me regarding the culture of corruption at OC HQ. The level of corruption there sometimes even comes close to the corruption I’ve uncovered next door in Nevada.
What I’m explaining is that the OC Supes govern this county in a more ideologically conservative/right-wing fashion than, say, LA County… Or even Ventura or San Diego County. They rail against Obamacare and mess with its implementation (cough- CalOptima -cough) while other municipal governments quietly ensure good stewardship and sound health care policies.
Vern, at the County you can be fired for asking that truth be told to authority, but you can be responsible for wasting millions and get attaboys and coverups just as long as you keep carrying the supervisor’s golf bag.
I’m gonna do a photoshop one-a these days, of Shawn Nelson with you sitting on one of his shoulders and Bilodeau sitting on the other one.
Lou Correa – done deal.
When are you going to join Matt and I for an Old Fashioned Skally?
So Lou’s about to do “a full 360”. Welcome back to OC HQ, I guess. And sadly, should he win, he’ll be “the progressive” on the dais.
Greg Chuyen Nguyen is not nor was a Van Tran ally. He was a staffer for Joe Dunn and a dear friend and former co-woker if mine.
Phan said in the interview that he is close to Dina Nguyen, who is a Van Tran ally. What I’ve heard is that he’s from the older generation that is uncomfortable with some of the cultural shifts in the Viet community (that Dina Nguyen has opposed in court) like allowing gays to march in the Tet Parade — something that both Correa and Phan support. (Or, if they don’t, they’re hypocrites, because they were both hanging out near the VROC float earlier this year being polite and friendly with teh gayz.)
By the way, if you’re a friend of Chuyen Nguyen, ask him why the hell he’s running given that he doesn’t have a chance in hell and come back to us with an exclusive!
Im guessing to drain votes away from Andre Do. That would be my best guess.
See the update. Unless Mark Lopez squeezed into the race very very late, it will be just five on the ballot: Lou Correa, Chris Phan, Andrew Do, Chuyen Nguyen, and Lupe Moreno.
I think the chronology of today’s events speaks for itself, regarding declining voter participation and its consequent disenfranchisement effects. Am I the only one who thinks it ABSURD that mere HOURS separated the candidate filing deadline, and the endorsement votes of both major parties (with implicit attachments of financial and logistic support) ? Save for a few candidate interviews (Thanks, OJB!) which, sadly, the electorate at large is probably still unaware of, the marginalization of all but the 2 major parties, inherent in the “Top-2” system, is only further concentrated by an accelerated, presumptive time frame. Why would cynicism, apathy, declining participation, and increasing government dysfunction surprise anyone?
Lou Correa in a cake-walk.
There’s always this tone of yours, where you don’t care what’s right or wrong, but just what is overwhelmingly powerful and wealthy.
That is the guiding philosophy of the Kleptocracy, a sort of materialism without the benefit of the existential moral ethos.
You are a pompass ass Zenger.
Funny. I described the philosophy but didn’t name you.
Now dogpaddle back to the shallow end and don’t forget your water wings.
Right and wrong have nothing to do with it – it’s politics.
And yet you’d be upset if I called you a fascist — especially if I did so accurately.
Maybe you’d cop to being a nihilist, though. Better yet, why choose?
So I am nihilistic fascist lacking a moral ethos because I think that Correa will win – even though I will not be voting for him ….. interesting.
You’re wonderful in my book Skally.
Head on over to my award winning blog to spew your brand of hate. It’s always welcome with me.
Then, dumbfuck, say who you’ll be voting for and why. Use your voice here for a LITTLE good at least.
Of COURSE Correa is the hands down favorite.
Ask me in a civil manner and I will tell you who and why.
No. You piss me off.
I didn’t actually call you a nihilistic fascist — brush up on the subjunctive, bunky — but let’s proceed as if I did. I’d say:
No, you’re a nihilist because you think that “Right and wrong have nothing to do with … politics.” You’re a fascist because you act on that belief on behalf of powerful oppressors, and you don’t do so because you favor redistribution of wealth to the poor, in which event you might instead be a nihilistic Stalinist.
You are a verbose pompass ass Diamond.
I want to be verbose, too.
It’s funny you mentioned Dave, I was planning to give you a thousand new words for Christmas. Forget about it though, I want it to be a surprise.
Practice, practice, practice.