Bad for Obama, Good for America? You bet!

obma_nobel_prize

I imagine there are a lot of you leftist carpet chewers out there who are just consternated. How can there be so many un-Americans out there? You breathlessly proclaim “Obama won the Nobel Prize!” and the yawning response from normal Obama supporters is “What for?” They can’t understand that it’s all about feeling good. Can these people not understand that when Barack Obama feels good, YOU feel good? You want affordable health insurance policies AND you want comprehensive coverage. What is it with these un-Americans who think there is some conflict between what you pay for and what you get? Why can’t they just go along and have it all?

Well, that would be because most people understand that there is all the difference in the world between what is good for Obama and what is good for America. Take the Olympic games. Good chance for Obama to look good? You bet! Good for slimy Chicago politics? You bet! Good for lining the pockets of supporters like Valerie Jarrett who turns good apartments into slums so they can be torn down to make way for an Olympic village? You bet!  Bad for America? You bet!

What was really alarming was the demonstrated belief by Barack Obama that there is no problem that will not melt before the sunshine of his charm. The President and First Lady went to Copenhagen and gave speeches – about themselves. The First Lady used the first person singular pronoun I or Me 34 times in 16 paragraphs. The President used it 23 times in 13 paragraphs. It was all about them. They made it about them. An adjective sooner or later attaches to every President. Honest Abe. Tricky Dick. This President is going to earn “Vain”.

If George W Bush had gone to Copenhagen on behalf of Houston, and pushed for the Olympics, the opobrium directed at him by state run media would have been deafening. And rightly so. But then, few other leaders who have been so arrogant as to make the Olympics about “THEM”.

But back to the Olympics…

How about all the jobs created?

Like building the 25000 seat handball court in London for 2012, when most British dont even know what handball is? That winning the games means a gold rush of jobs and hiring the vast armies of unemployed, is a myth. Most of the jobs are filled by specialists who come in from outside. And they take their pay home with them.

How about all the pride it will bring to the city?

Most locals leave the city during the Olympics, because life becomes almost intolerable. Its impossible to get any city help, or get anything fixed because they’re all getting rich at the Olympic Village. Remember the games in LA anyone, anyone? There hasn’t been a positive legacy left by the sporting events in the post-war era. Bad for America? You bet!

What about all the money that will be made?

The Olympic games are money losers. The Winter Olympics in Turin lost money, and the economy slowed. The 2012 Olympic games in London have already cost 4 times their original estimate, and the games are more than two years away. The Greeks and the Spaniards are still paying off their Olympic debts. We don’t have a roaring economy and endless money supply to support such ego driven enterprises. The final legacy of the games is always debt. Bad for America? You bet!

Now does that apply elsewhere?

It would have been a good thing if Obama had lost the Nobel Peace Prize. Good for America? You bet!

The Nobel Prize was given to Obama, nominated in his first 11 days in office, because of the promise of renewing diplomacy around the world. Obama, in his own way, did that and has now been rewarded for it. He has hugged Hugo Chavez and snubbed the Dalai Lama. He has left troops in Iraq and so far failed to apply his campaign promises to Afghanistan. He has pushed cap and trade tax and left our allies in the Czech Republic and Poland high and dry. Bad for America? You bet!

Carpet chewers are concerned about what others think of us, rather than doing what is right and moral. What others think of us is none of our business. What others do because of what they think of us is none of our business. Our business as world leader is to do what is moral and right. Unfortunately, a small group of Scandinavian anti-semitic socialists has awarded Obama for doing the opposite, and now we may get more of it. Bad for America? You bet!

If you’re a leftist truther, or warmer or garden-variety carpet chewer and you still think telling normal Americans that just because they put country before Obama looking good they’re un-patriotic, then let’s just remember a little of your history.

Remember,

You’re the ones who wanted America to lose a war.

You’re the ones who keep pretending our health care system isn’t good enough.

You’re the ones who wanted George W Bush to fail.

And I’m not talking about a few bed wetters. I’m talking about the leftists and the majority of people who vote Democrat. In other words, the rage extends way beyond the lip-pierced Deaniacs, aging hippies and other fringes of the Democratic Party. Lots of otherwise sensible people—suburban moms, hospital orderlies, schoolteachers, and big-hatted church ladies want America to fail. And you’re getting it with every step towards apology, feel-goodism, disarmament and do-nothingness.

Whether a commander in chief has a good day or not means nothing except to narcissists and those who spend their days swatting at imaginary flies.

About Terry Crowley