Miguel Pulido’s pal Alex Vega struck again late this afternoon, assembling about 20 of his family and friends in front of Santa Ana mayoral candidate APulido ally Alex Vega organizes protest at Alfredo Amezcua’s law officelfredo Amezcua’s law office, at 1319 N. Broadway, in Santa Ana.
The protesters carried signs alluding to Vega’s charges that Amezcua is a bad lawyer. That despite the fact that the California Stat Bar Association does not note any complaints in Amezcua’s file.
Why is Pulido allowing Vega to embarrass him like this? It would be one thing to argue the issues with Amezcua, but going after his business is a real low blow.
Click here to read the rest of this article.
I’ve been watching Santa Ana council meetings for years on channel 3 (a combination of colitis and arthritis keep me from driving up to the civic center these days) and have seen Gadflies like Alex Vega come and go. Like Jerry Springer, Judge Judy, or Professional Wrestling, these Gadflies are very entertaining. Vega is not unlike Florence Leech, Pat and Sean Mill, Jim Walker, Jan Boyer, Julie and Glenn Stroud, Dave Lopez, and many others whose names escape me, but whose Monday night antics live on in infamy. There are only three things certain in this life and they are death, taxes, and Gadflies. I’d say of the three the common Gadfly is the most amusing. I tried being a Gadfly for a spell but found I was too thin skinned. That old Mayor Young almost brought me to tears with a nasty look one time when I went up there to talk about trash fees.
One thing I’ve observed about Gadflies is can’t nobody control them. This Vega fella used to speak out against the Pulido crowd just like Sean and Pat Mill used to be anti-council until they got themselves appointed to some boards and now they are supporters of the council majority. You can’t tame a Gadfly. Anyway, Pulido can’t control Vega anymore than he can control Sean Mill. I recommend that old Al Amezqua just laughs it all off and goes about the business of running for Mayor and know that if he does get elected, them Gadflies will still be a buzzin around like they have for decades.
Ain’t no Raid Spray,
I don’t think it is fair to refer to Sean Mill as a gadfly. He writes for two of the top blogs in the state and he has the ear of the Council majority.
The current gadflies were out in full force last night at the Santa Ana City Council meeting. They included many members of the Usual Suspects, including Thomas Gordon and Debbie Mcewen. And members of SACRED, which has been corrupted by the Usual Suspects…
“I don’t think it is fair to refer to Sean Mill as a gadfly”
I agree Art. You can only be a Gadfly when you are generally opposed to the Council. Once you become more in line with the thinking of the Council majority you turn in your Gadfly card and exchange it for a tall glass of Kool-Aid!
Rat Patrol,
LOL! I speak to Sean every day. He is no Kool Aid drinker. And the fact is that the Council has turned on the Usual Suspects. That at least is a positive change.
I understand Alex Vega sought and recieved from the city of Santa Ana a permit to protest in front of Mr. Amezcua’s legal practice.
I understand before a permit is given for this type of activity a discription is presented. The PD reviews it and either allows or rejects the permit.
It seems to me that for no other reason the PD and city Manager should of rejected this permit simply because the activity is directed towards Mayor Pulido’s challenger for the coming Nov. election, not to mention the nature of the attack.
It is well known that the PD and FD of Santa Ana recieves over 70% of the city’s budget and the City Manager’s job is dependent on council approval.
The allowing of the permit raises many self interest questions with those associated including the Mayor, PD, City Manager and Alex Vega. The rumor is that Alex is compensated by The Mayor’s supporters. So, Alex is protecting his money source the only way he can. He has no ability to debate issues.
This election is a competition about who has the best ideas for the city and nothing else.
A competion like the sports or a job position. I can’t imagine this Alex Vega behavior in these examples.
City government has the ability and responsibility to stop Alex Vega from this most repulsive form of producing damage and affecting a city resident from having the ability to provide for his family.
This form of attack has nothing to do about Alfredo’s political life it is exclussively an attack to affect his ability to make a living.
Do you believe the city and PD would give a permit to a Alex Vega type to protest with signs in front of Polly’s saying the restaurant is infested with rodents and roaches? The city and PD gave a permit to similarily protest in front of Alfredo’s office. In both cases a permit would be given with no evedence of what the protest claims to be occurring.
This should not be tolerated by residents and business. This could happen to you if you fall out of favor.
“Pat Mill used to be anti-council until they got themselves appointed to some boards and now they are supporters of the council majority.”
What board was my mom appointed too? How do you know she is a “supporter” of the council majority?
She has not spoken at a council or city meeting in about 15 to 20 years. Why are you dragging her into your comments?
The gadflies in this city were in full effect at last nights city council meeting. Part-time resident/government employee Thomas “Tommy Boy” Gordon is the “King of the Gadflies”.
“This should not be tolerated by residents and business.”
Dr. Lomeli,
While I may not agree with what Vega was saying or doing I do believe he has every right to do it. It is no different than your buddy part-time resident/government employee “Tommy Boy” Gordon getting up at council meetings and spewing lies as he did again last night.
Do you support part-time resident/government employee “Tommy Boy” Gordon’s right to lie at council meetings?
“While I may not agree with what Vega was saying or doing I do believe he has every right to do it.”
I agree with Sean. Frankly, I think Mr. Vega’s protest is a bit 1960’s but whatever floats your boat. I say everyone who reads the O.J. blog go to Mr. Amezqua’s office today and use him to sue someone for a slip and fall or D.U.I.! Vote with your dollars and use Mr. Amezqua’s services to teach Vega a lesson. Tell him that you heard about it on the O.J. blog when you sign up to use him! O used to think it was wrong to cross a picket line but in this case I will. Vamanos!
I remember hearing about the Police and Fire protesting in front of the Mayor’s muffler shop and on the front lawns of Griset and Young. I guess this same thing has been going on forever.
“I remember hearing about the Police protesting on the front lawn of Griset”
You must be referring to the time that Councilman Dan Griset turned over the confidential list of SAPD police officers home addresses to original “usual suspect” Tom Lutz, prior to Lutz serving on the council, because Griset was pissed that the P.O.A. supported Rick Norton over him.
Classy move by the Godfather of the “usual suspects” Griset and his minion Lutz.
While I may not agree with what Vega was saying or doing I do believe he has every right to do it. It is no different than your buddy part-time resident/government employee “Tommy Boy” Gordon getting up at council meetings and spewing lies as he did again last night.
Are you serious? Thomas first of all did not ask for a permit to address the council. He is stating his opinion and nothing else. He is not attacking a council member’s professilnal integrety and their ability to make a living through their real jobs by stating lies.
Vega’s right to protest is not in question here. It is about self interests of those that give him the ability and the nature of the protest.
“While I may not agree with what Vega was saying or doing I do believe he has every right to do it.”
So you are OK with this then:
“give a permit to a Alex Vega type to protest with signs in front of Polly’s saying the restaurant is infested with rodents and roaches?”. I believe that is what you are saying by staing “he has every right to do it” I am shocked.
Dr. Lomeli,
I don’t know that the restaurant example fits. If a restaurant is serving bad food or has other public health issues then it deserves to be protested.
For example, the Lee’s Sandwiches owned by Supervisor Janet Nguyen’s husband and her Chief of Staff has had over fifty health violations. They deserve to be picketed!
What I don’t like about Vega protesting outside Amezcua’s office is that the protest is not about Amezcua’s politics but rather about trying to force him out of business even though his record as a lawyer is clean. That does not mean he is a great lawyer, but he has no charges on file with the California State Bar.
I would prefer that Pulido and company stick to the issues.
As for Thomas, he was ridiculous at last night’s Santa Ana City Council meeting. He went there to protest the installation of a fence at Godinez Park that was requested by the school district because they are afraid that a baseball might hit someone at the park. My son pitches for their JB baseball team. I agree that the fence is necessary.
Why Gordon is losing his mind over this fence is a real mystery. He has no kids and has no vested interest at that park.
Dr. Lomeli,
Part-time resident/government employee “Tommy Boy” Gordon is attacking the integrity of the council members when he makes up his lies and spews them. He lied about what he claimed Councilmember Tinajero told the Windsor Park neighborhood association. Part-time resident/government employee Gordon stated it as “fact” not “opinion”. If it is okay for him to attack the integrity of Sal Tinajero then why is it wrong for Vega to do the same?
I am fine with Vega protesting in front of Polly’s Pies. If he is wrongly defaming them they can sue. Alfredo should sue those folks if they are falsely accusing him. I think it is shameful that these folks would attack Alfredo in this way, just as I think it is shameful for part-time resident/government employee Gordon to attack the council with lies.
See that is the difference here, you think it is just fine and dandy for part-time resident/government employee Gordon to spread lies, but not Vega. I find both despicable, however I believe they are free to spew them if they so choose. They will pay for them one way or the other.
“Why Gordon is losing his mind over this fence is a real mystery. He has no kids and has no vested interest at that park.”
Art,
I think another question that we might ask of part-time resident/government employee Gordon is why isn’t he protesting the fence around the lawn bowling center that keeps Santa Ana residents out in favor of outsiders from other cities in the area?
Part-time resident/government employee Gordon and his Parks and Rec Commission pals Stroud and Leon support keeping Santa Ana residents out of the lawn bowling center. Why is that?
Sean,
Good point!
Isn’t it true that Stroud also tried to keep Little League families out of the park in her neighborhood by using the old parking permit gambit?
“I don’t know that the restaurant example fits”
Yes you do. If you don’t… I am sorry.
It is an injustice to give a permit to protest a business based on lies in order to financially and professionally cuase damage. That is where the example fits. Any one can protest to their hearts comtent. It is another thing for the city to facilitate through a permit. Try to get a permit generally for a gathering in the city and see how far you get. Not very far.
Dr. Lomeli,
Again, if the restaurant in your analogy DOES have public health issues, that is one thing.
In the case of Amezcua, it seems unfair to target his business when there is no public record of complaints against him.
Vega is clearly out of control. Pulido needs to put a tighter collar on his attack dog.
I think there is world of difference between someone protesting at Attorney Alfredo Amezcua’s office or against anyone other private citizen or BUSINESS; or someone “protesting” at a PUBLIC city council meeting.
1) The “Protesters” at the Attorney’s office are protesting against a PRIVATE individual and a private business…but with POLITICAL undertones and with a vested interest that BENEFITS AN INCUMBENT ELECTED official, while immediately NEGATIVELY affecting a local business and businessman.
I don’t think this is a Free Speech issue at a private matter.
Using private parties, or the power of a governmental agency to allow an attack against a business or businessman to benefit a public official sends a negative chilling message and sets a bad precedent.
2) The “Protesters” at a City Council meeting are rightfully entitled to speak for or against a past or contemplated decision by an ELECTED PUBLIC official. This is a Freedom of Speech issue, and holding public officials accountable is part of that process.
Francisco Barragan (my opinion only and not those of any group)
Santa Ana
“It is another thing for the city to facilitate through a permit.”
The city permits the gadflies “lie-fest” on the 1st and 3rd Monday’s of the month when they are allowed to spew their lies and venom from the podium.
I actually disagree with Vega having to get a permit. I think he should be allowed to protest without a permit if he chooses. In fact, I think that you and your friends should be allowed to protest if you want to as well.
If you and part-time resident/government employee Gordon want to picket in front of Sal’s house and “Tommy Boy” spew lies you should not need a permit.
“The “Protesters” at a City Council meeting are rightfully entitled to speak for or against a past or contemplated decision by an ELECTED PUBLIC official.”
Francisco,
Unfortunately part-time resident/government employee “Tommy Boy” Gordon was attacking Councilmember Tinajero for a decision made by the city council prior to Tinajero being on the council and he was lying about what Tinajero had told people regarding the issue.
“Isn’t it true that Stroud also tried to keep Little League families out of the park in her neighborhood by using the old parking permit gambit?”
Art,
If I remember correctly they led the effort to get parking permits around Alona Park in order to prevent folks who were coming to watch their children play little league from parking there. Of course most of those parents were Latino.
I am not sure if this was before or after they fought to keep the Tiger Woods Learning Center out of the area. The very successful project ended up in Anaheim serving their children instead of ours.
#20…I agree with you, it is unfortunate that someone lies as you stated Mr. Gordon did about Councilman Tinajero. This should be easy to disprove as you described it.
However, I think the difference still remains as I indicated at post #16 above.
Also, for the well-being of our city, I hope that this campaign is more about debating the issues and the ideas for solving our issues, rather than about mudslinging or “mudrakers”…and voters should use this is a guideline as they consider their choice for Mayor.
“You must be referring to the time that Councilman Dan Griset turned over the confidential list of SAPD police officers home addresses to original “usual suspect” Tom Lutz, prior to Lutz serving on the council, because Griset was pissed that the P.O.A. supported Rick Norton over him.”
No, I recall it was the police unions lighting candles and protesting on the front lawn of Grisett and Young for not giving them more money earlier retirement. As we see now, those deals are breaking the bank.
I am not sure if this was before or after they fought to keep the Tiger Woods Learning Center out of the area. The very successful project ended up in Anaheim serving their children instead of ours.
And think of the tragic loss for Santa Ana chiquitas!
KIDDING.
Vern,
LOL! Imagine if Loretta had gotten her mitts on Tiger. Cougar vs. Tiger!
I saw and heard the protester’s, I could not tell if they were anti or pro Amezcua. they yelled in spanish and the signs were in spanish. I think they had little impact in the community.
On a side note, this old white woman told me she likes and repects Amezcua. She watched the protestor walk down the street with me.
cook,
Alfredo can be very charming with las viejitas…
The point here is that the city gave a permit to a political soldier of the Mayor who’s purpose is to attack a resident and political challenger to the Mayor for the purpose to defame and damge the protest target’s ability to earn a living.
The self interest connections are flatant.
It is a dangerous precedent and should be challenged at every level.
What ever happened to the “Lutz’s” Did they just pave the way for the Franklins and Doughtys to be quiet and except the evolution (and still sell houses to white friends at inflaed prices)?
DKMFAN,
They still live in Washington Square. I believe part-time resident/government employee “Tommy Boy” Gordon had them sign Harish Sidhu’s central committee nomination papers. Apparently the Lutz’s support carpetbaggers.
So Alex “Swampmeet” Vega protested in front of Amezcua’s office. BFD. He entered the lion’s den and what did he expect? A pussycat? Oh Puhleeeeeese. If Amezcua is crying now, he’ll be squealing like a pig before the election in November.
Why doesn’t Amezcua get a permit and have his Ususal Suspect amigos, Tommy Boy GORDON aka El Gordo Loco, Julie STROUD aka My Daughter Got Pregnant by a Mexican, Tish Leon aka I Answer the Phones at Public Law Center LEON and the rest of his F Troop Gang protest at Pulido’s house for being a lousy Mayor.
I can’t wait to see what happens to Tommy Boy Gordon when he runs for City Council Ward 6. I hope he wears clean shirts when he makes public appearances. At least clean shirts minus the food stains.
Why the fixation on Thomas Gordon. This thread is not about him. Am I missing something.
“If Amezcua is crying now, he’ll be squealing like a pig before the election in November.”
This is the best and the strategy against Amezcua? The voters are not buying it.
“What ever happened to the “Lutz’s”
They are still helping with the Washington Square neighborhood. Painting out graffiti, and doing anything they can to improve Santa Ana. Did you know thier home was once featured in Sunset Magazine?
“Why the fixation on Thomas Gordon.”
Dr. Lomeli,
Part-time resident/government employee “Tommy Boy” Gordon is not much different from Vega with the exception that Gordon is unable to organize the number of folks that Vega does. Part-time resident/government employee “Tommy Boy” Gordon does the same sort of thing that Vega does except Gordon does it at city sanctioned meetings.
Part-time resident/government employee “Tommy Boy” Gordon uses a public event to spread his lies and propaganda, but that’s okay with you. I think both actions are despicable, why don’t you?
Thomas and any other resident have a civic right and responsibility to question the actions and in actions of their government as they perceive it. That is the reason for council meetings. If a resident expresses a concerned generally or directed at a specific council member or staff the forum is set up for clarification by those questioned.
Do you object to the public having such a forum in order to hold the council, council members, the Mayor and city employees accountable?
Your example of Gordon and Vega is apples and oranges.
I do not think both actions are despicable. I think Vega and those facilitating Vega are despicable.
“Thomas and any other resident have a civic right and responsibility to question the actions and in actions of their government as they perceive it.”
Dr. Lomeli,
Part-time resident/government employee “Tommy Boy” Gordon uses these public forums to promulgate lies as he did once again Monday night inregards to his comments about Councilmember Tinajero. Part-time resident/government employee “Tommy Boy” Gordon also has a civic right and responsibility to tell the truth, he fails to do this regularly.
Part-time resident/government employee “Tommy Boy” Gordon’s actions are akin to yelling “fire” in a crowded theatre. He’s promotes lies as truth in an effort to stir up anger and fear in the community.
Part-time resident/government employee “Tommy Boy” Gordon loves to troll meetings in search of folks that have issues within the city and then feeds them lies and misinformation in an effort to win their trust. It is simply shameful.
Your support of his lie filled attacks is quite surprising.
“I think Vega and those facilitating Vega are despicable.”
What is the difference between Mr. Vega and other victims of Al’s law practice voicing their feelings of wrong doing and Art Lomeli besmirching the reputation of Mayor Pulido on public blogs? I see none. If an unhappy Dental patient wants to go on Yelp and tell about their bad experiences with a dentist they have a right to do so and one might add the obligation to do so to prevent further sub-standard care. Mr. Vega also has a moral obligation to the Hispanic community to warn them of shoddy legal care if that is his belief.
Your position is the surprising news here.
Do you object to the public having such a forum in order to hold the council, council members, the Mayor and city employees accountable?
The council has the civic responsibility to address and answer the public’s concerns. This should also be your concern as a city resident.
Dr. Lomeli,
Why are you surprised that I oppose lies being spread by part-time resident/government employee “Tommy Boy” Gordon or anyone else?
I have no problem with the public having a forum to address the mayor and council. I do however take issue when folks like part-time resident/government employee “Tommy Boy” Gordon use that forum to promulgate lies.
Your buddy and part-time resident/government employee Gordon is a gadfly in 2 cities, Denver and Santa Ana. His act is not only tired here, but it is likely tired there as well.
The public, particularly part-time resident/government employee Gordon, has a responsibility to speak the truth at these public forums. Gordon is famous for exagerating, embellishing or flat-out lying.
Do you not object to folks alligned with you telling lies? Or is making the mayor and council look bad all that matters and the truth be damned?
#37,
The point here is that the city gave a permit to a political soldier of the Mayor who’s purpose is to attack a resident and political challenger to the Mayor for the purpose to defame and damage the protest target’s ability to earn a living.
The self interest connections are blatant.
It is a dangerous precedent and should be challenged at every level.
Please give me examples of how I am besmirching the reputation of Mayor Pulido. I like The Mayor as a person. We are very civil and respectful with each other. He is not my enemy. I am simply a critic on how the city is currently managed.
I do not criticise or take issue on how he manages his business interests. That is separate and private. There are specific professional agencies to address issues the public has with professional misconduct.
Sean,
“Do you not object to folks alligned with you telling lies? Or is making the mayor and council look bad all that matters and the truth be damned?”
You have the forum here to correct the lies. Tinajero has the city council meetings which are televised and can reach all of the city.
I challenge Thomas on this blog whenever I disagree with him.
Thomas is not allingned with me in any sense you might want to produce any more than Alex Vega would be allingned with you….correct?
“Or is making the mayor and council look bad all that matters and the truth be damned?”
Do you believe anyone having concerns and differences about the management of the city is only concerned with making the Mayor and council look bad?
The intent is to have the best interests of the resident’s protected.
You argument is lacking. I doubt the Mayor and council agree with you.
” political soldier of the Mayor who’s purpose is to attack a resident and political challenger ”
Soldier? That’s pretty inflammatory language for a guy who says he “likes the Mayor personally”. With friends like that, who needs enemies? Could it be that Al Amezqua also has “political soldiers” and that you might be one of them? Could it be that you are assigned to more civil blogging and others are assigned with the “dirty work”?
Dr. Lomeli,
It is not about “disagreeing” with part-time resident/government employee “Tommy Boy” Gordon, it is about his continual exagerations, embellishing and flat out lying.
As far as “challenging” part-time resident/government employee Gordon on this or any other blog that is kind of difficult because he operates in the shadows and slanders, libels and smear in a cloak of anonymity as he did with the “Pedrozabot” Twitter account.
No I don’t believe that most folks that speak at the council meetings are wanting to make anyone look bad. The have legitimate concerns that effect them and they speak on them. Part-time resident/government employee Gordon is clearly most concerned with attacking the council.
Funny that he raises a ruckus about a fence at Centennial Park and yet he supports a fence that keeps Santa Ana residents out of a huge section of Santiago Park. Why isn’t he more consistent?
You and part-time resident/government employee Gordon are both actively involved in SACReD aren’t you? Does SACReD support liars? I am not connected to Mr. Vega in any way shape or form.
“You argument is lacking”
Dr. Lomeli,
What is lacking is an answer from you as to why it is okay for part-time resident/government employee “Tommy Boy” Gordon to lie when addressing the city council.
“You and part-time resident/government employee Gordon are both actively involved in SACReD aren’t you? Does SACReD support liars? I am not connected to Mr. Vega in any way shape or form.”
Members of SACRed support responsible development within Santa Ana. Thomas and I are supporters of SACReD.
You and Vega are supporters and actively involved with the re election of the Mayor. Alex vega is a liar. By your logic you are then associated with Vega. Then answer your own question, Do you support liars. Pretty rediculous to have this argument Hah?
I do not supports liars. Thomas should not tell lies. It is shameful if he is.
“You and Vega are supporters and actively involved with the re election of the Mayor.”
Dr. Lomeli,
I am not involved “actively” or any other way with the re-election of Mayor Pulido. I think the Mayor would be quite surprised himself to hear that I am on his campaign team.
I support the re-election of Sal Tinajero and Michele Martinez and the election of anyone running against “usual suspect” Councilman David Benevides.
MANUEL LOZADA,
“Soldier” in relation to a campaign is hardly derogatory.In fact it is a term descriptive of loyalty. I have no problem with the term used in my association with Alfredo.
The point here is that the city gave a permit to a political soldier of the Mayor who’s purpose is to attack a resident and political challenger to the Mayor for the purpose to defame and damage the protest target’s ability to earn a living.
The self interest connections are blatant.
It is a dangerous precedent and should be challenged at every level.
I support the re-election of Sal Tinajero and Michele Martinez and the election of anyone running against “usual suspect” Councilman David Benevides.
All of the above support the re election of the Mayor, so your logic association remains.
“All of the above support the re election of the Mayor, so your logic association remains.”
Dr. Lomeli,
SACReD supporters and your friends part-time resident/government employee Gordon and Fraudio “5150” Gallegos love Benevides so I guess they must be supporters of Pulido as well. Right?
It’s nice to see that Mr. Pulidos monkey is doing an awsome job at protesting a bunch of lies or as i would say a bunch of B.S. and gathering people who he has brain washed with a bunch of lies. I cant believe that in a few months I will be eligible to vote and seeing how low this democratic process has gone. Spreading lies, brain washing people, and making a fool of your self seems to me that Mr. Vega is still a child. If I were to ever see Mr. Vega which I will try to do during this spring spreak I would ask him “Who threw you a bone.” Since if he were brave enough he should go to one of the debates and see if he is a Macho men and accuse Amezcua in his face and see what Pulido does.
“The point here is that the city gave a permit to a political soldier of the Mayor”
Dr. Lomeli,
My question is, did he even need a permit? I doubt that he did. If he did, why?
Lupe and the other yahoo’s that are in front of the Mexican Consulate don’t have a permit, do they?
If they don’t need one then why does Vega?
Vern Nelson says:
April 6, 2010 at 6:27 pm
“I am not sure if this was before or after they fought to keep the Tiger Woods Learning Center out of the area. The very successful project ended up in Anaheim serving their children instead of ours.
And think of the tragic loss for Santa Ana chiquitas!
KIDDING.
25
Art Pedroza says:
April 6, 2010 at 6:35 pm
Vern,
LOL! Imagine if Loretta had gotten her mitts on Tiger. Cougar vs. Tiger!”
careful- you forgot-
FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY- LOL
Bottomline, this “aborto” “corriente,mal hecho”, Alex Vega is exercising his Right to Peaceful Assembly– the reason he obtained a city permit is because he is on public property- the city- and the city needs to be informed in order to “Ensure Domestic Security” in its broad nature-applying it at the local level = public safety.
As long as there is no violence or disturbing of the peace- remember -“Right to Peaceful Assembly”=First Amendment Right… then no one may deny them their right to protest regardless what the topic is- Freedom of Speech- Right to Peaceful Assembly-
Now the protestors, however, may not set one toe on Mr. Amezcua’s property line, big period.!!!
The permit may by no means on this earth be denied — it is more “following protocol” in order to formally inform the city and law enforcement agencies.
As long as none of the protestors went on Mr. Amezcua’s property then he needs to get ready for more if this where this came from. ( if they did–pictures are important- then he can sue them personally for trespassing) ( then if it is during business hrs. they can argue that they were there to solicit Mr. A’s services-UNLESS the pictures incriminate them – if they are holding a sign-per se…) complex huh 🙂
Technically they don’t need a city permit to protest, however, if this protest were to get out of hand- with hundreds of ppl. pouring on to the streets, or a few getting violent, then it is worst if the city was not informed before the peaceful assembly/protest.- then they will be guilty of disturbing the peace.
I smell a rat-
I think there is fishy stuff with this mayoral race-
using this dweeb to stage a lawsuit against the city-maybe by both candidates??
I think this election will not end without either candidate or even both of them suing the city- and that sucks
voters are not ignorant– LEAVE OUR CITY ALONE, ALREADY!
Whether they are all in cahoots or not—
Like Art’s mentioned too much business and deals in common with these two… too many deals behind closed doors-NO BUENO!
do I hear all say “3rd candidate please”!
FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY – Just In Time
Sean,
“SACReD supporters and your friends part-time resident/government employee Gordon and Fraudio “5150″ Gallegos love Benevides so I guess they must be supporters of Pulido as well. Right?”
Not by my logic. True, using your logic.
Wait–didn’t Sean think Michelle was horrible, and now supports her? What happened, Sean?