Memories of the interleague whuppin’ the Angels have been putting on los Doyers will fade when the All-Star Game comes to Anaheim next month and brings protests from LA and OC pro-immigrant advocates alike with it.
Demonstrators calling on Major League Baseball Commissioner Bud Selig to move the 2011 All-Star Game out of Arizona for its recent unconstitutional sins are already organizing actions in response to his continued indifference to their cause.
Details and logistics of what is to go down has yet to be set, but activists opposed to SB 1070 and other legislative madness coming out of the Grand Canyon state plan to descend upon Angel Stadium from 3-6 p.m. on July 13th. It will be a fresh addition to the weekend’s festivities and probably more fun than the often boring home run derby!
In the meantime, for the Facebook savvy, sign the following petition or go to movethegame.org to let Selig know that, in 2011, Arizona should be tossed out of the game !
gabriel have you been taking lessons from art . i dont see the word ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS in the piece .. boycott all you want 80 % of the public is against you .
Out of curiosity, where would you have liked me to insert the word “illegal” into the post? And where do you cite this ‘80% of the public’ figure from? Looks like you could use some lessons of your own…
maybe by adding this even though 80 % of the public is against this , and bud selig already said the all star game WILL NOT BE MOVED . 80% READ THE NEWS . NOT FROM TELEMUNDO . 2 LESSONS FOR YOU .
Give a source citation for the percentage you pilfer out. And you selected no particular sentence or paragraph in which inserting “illegal” would be necessary/warranted.
Swing and a miss, strike TWO! haha
CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll. May 21-23, 2010. N=1,023 adults nationwide. MoE ± 3.
“Creating a program that would allow illegal immigrants already living in the United States for a number of years to stay here and apply to legally remain in this country permanently if they had a job and paid back taxes”
5/21-23/10 80% favor 19% appose 1% unsure
ABC News/Washington Post Poll. June 3-6, 2010. N=1,004 adults nationwide. MoE ± 3.5.
“Would you support or oppose a program giving ILLEGAL immigrants now living in the United States the right to live here LEGALLY if they pay a fine and meet other requirements?”
Support Oppose Unsure
6/3-6/10 57% favor 40% oppose 9% unsure
4/21-24/09 61% favor 35% appose 3% unsure
A new law in Arizona would give police the power to ask people they’ve stopped to verify their residency status. Supporters say this will help crack down on illegal immigration. Opponents say it could violate civil rights and lead to racial profiling. On balance, do you support or oppose this law?”
Support Oppose Unsure
6/3-6/10 58% favor 41% appose 2% unsure
What these polls say is that there is an agreement against illegal imigration . At the same time there is an agreement on immigration reform that offers legal residence.
Protests are not for illegal immigration . It is against violation of civil rights. Everyone is against illegal immigration, the great one and others confuse this to advance their agenda.
doc dont you love the way they ask those questions . . here is one for you and it will get 80 % so you and san gabby can take this one to the bank . do you support the new az law . plain n simple 80 & so gabby and the doc and the other 20% can sscream , yell boycott all you want . you guys are always deflecting the issure of stopping law breakers from entering this country . the moment you take one step into his country . YOU HAVE BROKEN THE LAW . HOME RUN OFF YOU GABBY
th great one,
” here is one for you and it will get 80 % so you and san gabby can take this one to the bank . do you support the new az law ”
How is your wording different from the ABC poll?
A new law in Arizona would give police the power to ask people they’ve stopped to verify their residency status. Supporters say this will help crack down on illegal immigration. Opponents say it could violate civil rights and lead to racial profiling. On balance, do you support or oppose this law?”
This is the great one”s data source (his imagination) ” here is one for you and it will get 80 % so you and san gabby can take this one to the bank “. The data is made up in his biased brain….”it will get 80 % ”
It is just too funny.
the great one, again. THE PROTEST IS ABOUT VIOLATING CIVIL RIGHTS OF LEGAL RESIDENTS.
Here is another poll for you. This one is from your guys. Itis not 80% in favor.
FOX News/Opinion Dynamics Poll. May 18-19, 2010. N=900 registered voters nationwide. MoE ±
“Would you favor or oppose YOUR state passing an immigration law like Arizona’s new law?” N=884 respondents outside of Arizona, MoE ± 3
Favor Oppose Unsure
5/18-19/10 52% favor 31%oppose 18% unsure
Hey, Great One: Aren’t you Cuban?
I also did not see the words “racist, or double standard”in the post either. Add another 1%, i don’t need 80% of the “good ol’ boys”. Me 1 I make a difference. The Fake One, and his fake numeros don’t add up
I shouldn’t have to state this but we are not a gov’t that follows Majority rules don’t trample on minority rights.
If we did, then prop 187 would be law. Many of the racist laws, especially those when uncertain economic times are the underlying issues are brought out by those unprepared, unskilled, or unaware that the issues relating to their predicament is their own fault not some day laborer digging ditches.
Sure, there is a deep demand for gov’t services from the undoc population but the issue is welfare reform and America’s dependecy on jumping on the gov’t subsidized gravy train.
Polls that state are going to chnge my position on Arizona’s law and if my undestanding is correct the Obama administration will challenge this legislation…rightly because the majority of American voted for Obama so in the case Majority rules will preserve minority rights.
Equal rights for all not just the 80% that are pushed or pulled to one side.
@ The Fake One:
Even though you’re making up inflated numbers, SO WHAT that the majority supports SB1070? That doesn’t make it just. The majority of the south supported segregation. The majority thought and still believes the free market would stop immigration when it actually exacerbated it.
If popularity is your measure of success, then we could assume you think American Idol is quality programming, and that FOX is a news channel.
History will prove you the fool, although you’re doing pretty well here in the present.
the great one takes his third swing and it’s another strike to retire the side!
oh all you law breaker supporters . its the law . this law has been in affect for 50 years . you use the racial profiling excuse on everything . if you are legal you have nothing to fear . its the illegals .WHO ARE NOT SUPPOSE TO BE HERE .. SO SCREAM , CRY ,YELL , give out all the 8 pages of stats . THE MAJORTY OF THE PEOPLE DONT WANT ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION . you guys want to do a end run with it . look at all the cities now supporting the law . 187 WAS GREAT YOU SHOULD TAKE AWAY THE CARROTT and they wont come here .
lets just start some massive deportations and move on. this is getting ridiculous
The Old One: “those people are my slaves. IT’S THE LAW”. “That woman cannot vote. IT’S THE LAW.” “Those Chinese are enemies” “This country will never change”
“Segregation now. Segregation always.” -George Wallace.
the great one,
the great one, again. THE PROTEST IS ABOUT VIOLATING CIVIL RIGHTS OF LEGAL RESIDENTS
“187 WAS GREAT YOU SHOULD TAKE AWAY THE CARROTT and they wont come here ..”
Small problem great one ….it was found unconstitutional. No never mind to you guys.
“THE MAJORTY OF THE PEOPLE DONT WANT ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION . you guys want to do a end run with it . look at all the cities now supporting the law . ”
They all also support immigration reform with anmesty.
Yeah this appeal to the sentiments of the masses – I should say, the ALLEGED sentiments of the masses being asked questions in certain ways by pollsters – is always a very weak fallback argument.
amensty doctor NOW YOU ARE WAY OFF YOUR ROCKER . YEAH RIGHT AMENSTY . OK LETS PUT TO VOTE OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE FOR AMENSTY AND SEE HOW MUCH YOU GET CRUSHED BYE . . STAY OFF THE TELEMUNDO AND THE EL PINONI OR WHAT EVER HIS NAME IS RADIO STATION .
TO JOHN MORALES FOX IS THE NUMBER CHANNEL . YOU READ THE EL OPINON FOR YOUR INFO OR WATCH TELEMUNDO . SUPPORTERS OF LAW BREAKERS LIKE YOU . . SINCE YOU HAVE SPOKEN ON HERE NOW WE KNOW THAT YOU HAVE JOINED THE OTHER FOOLS ON HERE . CONGRATS .
deadwhitemale
Posted June 24, 2010 at 9:05 AM
lets just start some massive deportations and move on. this is getting ridiculous
Mass deportation: Wikipedia
According to The Washington Post,[72] Rajeev K. Goyle, of the Center for American Progress, a liberal Washington think tank, says he conducted a study to respond to conservative officials who have advocated mass deportations. This study claims that the cost of forcibly removing most of the nation’s estimated 10 million illegal immigrants is $41 billion a year. A spokesman for Rep. Tom Tancredo calls the study “useless” because no one’s talking about employing mass deportation as a tactic. Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, describes the study as a cartoon version of how enforcement would work.
There have been two major periods of mass deportations in U.S. history. In the Mexican Repatriation of the 1930s, through mass deportations and forced migration, an estimated 500,000 Mexicans and Mexican Americans were deported or coerced into emigrating, in what Mae Ngai, an immigration history expert at the University of Chicago, has described as “a racial removal program”.[73] The majority of those removed were U.S. Citizens.[73] Rep. Luis Gutierrez, D-Ill., cosponsor of a U.S. House Bill that calls for a commission to study the “deportation and coerced emigration” of U.S. citizens and legal residents, has expressed concerns that history could repeat itself, and that should illegal immigration be made into a felony, this could prompt a “massive deportation of U.S. citizens”.[73] Later, in Operation Wetback in 1954, when the United States last deported a sizable number of illegal immigrants, in some cases along with their U.S. born children (who are citizens according to U.S. law),[74] some illegal immigrants, fearful of potential violence as police swarmed through Mexican American barrios throughout the southeastern states, stopping “Mexican-looking” citizens on the street and asking for identification, fled to Mexico.[74]
the great one: eres Cubano? Are you really Kendry Morales posting under an assumed name? jajaja!
gabriel san roman
Posted June 24, 2010 at 10:26 AM
the great one: eres Cubano? Are you really Kendry Morales posting under an assumed name? jajaja!
He has posted he is Cubano. He apposes immigration reform because of the anmesty while arriving here from Cuba because of amnesty. The double standard and hypocrisy.
yeah, it’s not like Mexico wasn’t ruled by a one-party dictatorship for decades up until 2000…
doctor frankenstine lomelli has gone off the deep end . are you trying to compare cuba to mexico . haaaaaaa 2 totally different things when it comes to amensty .. the cubans get it for a different reason . your boy slick willie was the one who made up wet foot dry foot . its pisses off people like you and the others . i agree with dead white male ENFORCE THE FREAKIN LAW .
the great one
Posted June 24, 2010 at 10:16 AM
amensty doctor NOW YOU ARE WAY OFF YOUR ROCKER . YEAH RIGHT AMENSTY . OK LETS PUT TO VOTE OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE FOR AMENSTY AND SEE HOW MUCH YOU GET CRUSHED BYE . . STAY OFF THE TELEMUNDO AND THE EL PINONI OR WHAT EVER HIS NAME IS RADIO STATION .
the great one pay attention. read below again. your attention span away from your agenda is low.
CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll. May 21-23, 2010. N=1,023 adults nationwide. MoE ± 3.
“Creating a program that would allow illegal immigrants already living in the United States for a number of years to stay here and apply to legally remain in this country permanently if they had a job and paid back taxes”
5/21-23/10 80% favor 19% appose 1% unsure
ABC News/Washington Post Poll. June 3-6, 2010. N=1,004 adults nationwide. MoE ± 3.5.
“Would you support or oppose a program giving ILLEGAL immigrants now living in the United States the right to live here LEGALLY if they pay a fine and meet other requirements?”
Support Oppose Unsure
6/3-6/10 57% favor 40% oppose 9% unsure
4/21-24/09 61% favor 35% appose 3% unsure
If you believe the country apposes amnesy then you should start by deporting yourself.
the great one,
You are a fool if you do not understand amnesty is given due to oppression. This comes in many forms and sources. Cuba is but one example.
People immigrate illegally and legally to this country mostly due to oppression. Oppression is the similarity between Cuba and Mexico.
“. i agree with dead white male ENFORCE THE FREAKIN LAW .”
No one is argueing this on this thread. Get of your agenda soap box.
the great one, again. THE PROTEST IS ABOUT VIOLATING CIVIL RIGHTS OF LEGAL RESIDENTS.
the law states that they must have broken another law , or be detained fro something they did and then they can be asked about their status . how is that breaking their civil rights . if you are a citizen i would not be worried about this law . if your a illegal i would . because you are not suppose to be here . it is illegal for you to work here , plain n simple , now the people who hire them should be punished too . i dont agree with cuba and mexico being the same . in mexico people leave there to find work here . in cuba its freedom they seek . i have said before if your from mexico and own a home and choose to leave you still own that house . if you get caught and sent back you get to try again , and again , in cuba if you leave your house is gone , and if you get caught . a jail awaits for you or a wall where they can shoot you . . doc we can go all day on this we will never agree ..
the great one: So prior to 2000, Mexicans weren’t oppressed by a decades-long rotating presidents one party dictatorship? How about people from Oaxaca fleeing the brutality of Governor Ruiz? Isn’t the economic aspect of governance a key part of oppression? The Mexican army is one of many human rights abuses and yet reporters from Mexico who dare to tell the truth against them or cartels still have not received one single approval for asylum in the United States.
China is a one-party dictatorship. Does the United States have a wet foot dry foot policy for all such immigrants fleeing nation states under that form of governance?
Everyone,
Don’t let The Grating One fool you into thinking he’s such a great respecter of the rule of law. This guy was SILENT during the illegal wiretapping of American citizens and during illegal torture of detainees, for example. He respects the law when it suits his agenda. What a hypocrite.
the great one,
“i dont agree with cuba and mexico being the same . in mexico people leave there to find work here . in cuba its freedom they seek . ”
Both seek freedom from oppression.Different forms maybe, none the less oppression.
“the law states that they must have broken another law , or be detained fro something they did and then they can be asked about their status . ” WRONG.
SB1070 produces:
– can check immigration status when having legal contact
-not being documented is a crime
-Police can under suspecion of a crime have alegal contact.
So police suspicious of some one beign undocumented can stop that individual because undocumented is a crime.
The result is abuse leading to violation of civil rights and profiling.
doctor what about fed law that gives you no reason at all to ask you about your status . and to anon who i think its commi anoster . i am for wire tapping how does that suit you . and i am for waterboarding to get info out of TERRORIST . PERHAPS YOUR VIEWS WOULD BE TO GIVE THEM MILK N COOKIES AND SING THEM A SONG .. your the hypocrit what a tool you are . tapping americans who want to hurt the country . do you think they wire tap me or you . well maybe you.. dont know about your background but it does not surprise me if its you from all your prior post . illegal torture of detanies . haaaaaaaa maybe you should get caught by the enemy . see what happens to your head .
haha, you are a mockery!
the great one,
“doctor what about fed law that gives you no reason at all to ask you about your status .”
Exactly, it is a federal issue not a police issue. This is another reason SB 1070 will be defeated in the courts.
Your other comments on this post…………you are a scary guy.
the great one wrote:
” i am for wire tapping how does that suit you . and i am for waterboarding to get info out of TERRORIST . ”
You are perfect fit at Guantanamo Cuba. It is not too late . Deport yourself and get a job there to deal with terrorists.
The Grate One is for illegal wiretapping and illegal torture. In other words, The Grate One does not respect the rule of law. It’s as simple as that.
OH I RESPECT IT THE RULE OF LAW .. ITS YOU GUYS DONT WANT TO FOLLOW IT . illegal wire tapping WHEN ITS ILLEGAL .. NOT BY YOUR DEFANITION . COMMI ANON .. .for the DOCTOR . if the feds came down to a.z on raids .you would be out there trying to stop them .. like the cooks at the rallies who cry STOP THE RAIDS . . doc you got nothing to fear from me . i am a normal guy . but maybe you go go down to join pedroza in trying to stop la migra from doing their job . they might ask for your papers .. you could get deported and try and sneak back in ..
the great one,
Your attempt at humor is alarming as much is your selective application of laws and support of selectively breaking laws.
the great one, again. THE PROTEST IS ABOUT VIOLATING CIVIL RIGHTS OF LEGAL RESIDENTS.
” illegal wire tapping WHEN ITS ILLEGAL .. NOT BY YOUR DEFANITION . COMMI ANON .”
Illegal wire tapping great one …….read again the word is ILLEGAL.
PLEASE RESPECT THE RULE OF LAW!!!!!!!!!!!!!l
Grate One,
It’s not my definition, you idiot. It’s the law. Wiretapping on American citizens without FISA court approval is illegal. That was done during the previous administration.
What part of illegal don’t you understand?
Torture is illegal under the United Nations Convention Against Torture (championed, by the way, by Ronald Reagan). The Convention has the same weight as the law, and the United States is a signing and ratifying nation to the Convention. Signing nations are OBLIGATED to prosecute torturers.
What part of illegal don’t you understand?
You like to throw the word “illegal” around. But it’s clear you don’t mind when our government does something illegal when it suits your agenda.
That is the very definition of a hypocrite.
the great one suffers from the same rule of law contradictions as the Orange City Clowncil!
Exactly. I can’t wait for Robert Rodriguez’ film “Machete,” we saw the previews on Cinco de Mayo.
The tough female-avenger character, hearing some immigrant-basher say “It’s the law,” responds: THERE ARE MANY LAWS.
hey gabriel tienne papels .. . hey san gabby when you cross the border without papers YOU ARE ILLEGAL .. WHAT PART OF ILLEGAL DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND . ?
@The Lame One: Don’t address me unless you identify yourself, like the rest of us. Clown.
Feel free to join me on the 13th and we can discuss this like adults.
Hey Grate One,
You’ve been exposed as a fraud who only respects the rule of law when it suits your political agenda. So you can stop coming here and boring us with your “what part of illegal” schtick…we no longer take it seriously.
Wow. What do you have left, Grate? Just simple “I don’t like so many mexicans around me?” (IN ALL CAPS, NATCH.)
the great one
Posted June 24, 2010 at 10:06 PM
hey gabriel tienne papels .. .
The great one has a problem with the written language in Spanish as well as English. He butchers both……..hey gabriel tienne papels .. .
His responsibility within his group is to promote ILLEGAL for publicity to incite hate. Everyone of his posts is about this word. any response to him he will ignore and come back with ILLEGAL.
Point now is that he does not understand illegal as he supports illegal actions and so does not respect the rule of law.
Wow, now we know why Mexico is such a pit….. Nothing but gang members in suite’s and degree’s stolen with the color of your skin and of course the left wing who are making this country into the next pit!
Why does it take so many of you to take on TGO, you cannot do it alone?
I cannot waste much time, because I am busy making money to feed your people and dress and educate your people’s children! (MEXICANS) just wanted to make that clear!
1st
haha, you are a mockery!
If it is a tosh up between who makes the case of their race being intelligent, it would definitely not be YOU!
TGO being Cuban has lots of American and Immigrant friends who very much agree with his logic. YOU on the other hand are just another Mexican moan bag who’s views and logic do not sit well with the majority of this country!
So the only Mockery here is that you are a disgrace to your race!
2nd
“You are perfect fit at Guantanamo Cuba. It is not too late . Deport yourself and get a job there to deal with terrorists.”
Dr. unlike most of your friends, TGO can come and go as he pleases… Its called legal residents, a status that Mexicans feel they are too important to bother with!
I am sure many Americans agree with me, that I would rather have a cuban dealing with terrorists than a Mexican who know’s all the great pathways in to this country!
3td
“Feel free to join me on the 13th and we can discuss this like adults.”
I would rather you shut up and not discuss your idiotic Mexican social justice nonsense with anyone, but of course that is not going to happen. I suggest TGO wear ear plugs and just nod his head!
“Wow. What do you have left, Grate? Just simple “I don’t like so many mexicans around me?” (IN ALL CAPS, NATCH.)”
We don’t mind Mexicans around us, unless they think like you Vern!
We really need to close the border, I don’t think we can take more entitled Mexican off spring we have enough idiot leftist’s left over from the boomers!
Is that not right VERN!
I have your back TGO, when too many are on it!
Unlike the Mexican activist’s and the left wing, CUBANS are brilliantly brave and need no assistance… I hope you don’t mind MY CUBAN FRIEND? 🙂